IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Thu, 10 March 2011 06:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BAF3A693B for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:08:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V7fZXKZDL9HM for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:08:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3858E3A6934 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:08:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; l=1172; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1299737383; x=1300946983; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=hV4wytkejkLlYHk5Ay+b+AH5VVH3rmhRZFkIU7nweHA=; b=dZAgS2Nsf/8D/63gA0ukNrmR/DXsR24acZOKnikgpjOffW5JfSjedFfZ iwvgBacR/f7NBky6XXXpMXERuza+JjiB5KqgLWYArm0xvXFRYmxzlOln0 8HKRfXSUGU3XOGZ8pWhbH5vkLkQt03B5+uMNGDnOFC/fqey8GJo7OULMU 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,294,1297036800"; d="scan'208";a="273679258"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2011 06:09:43 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8711.cisco.com [10.99.80.18]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2A69gtV007096; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:09:43 GMT
Message-Id: <201103100609.p2A69gtV007096@sj-core-4.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:09:40 -0600
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <82D5D06C-07BE-495B-90E4-A51E8C7CB438@nostrum.com>
References: <4D6C31DC.80005@nostrum.com> <C7E060E7-9B2E-4FB3-9600-0A2B7776B403@nostrum.com> <201103100020.p2A0KbV6024147@sj-core-5.cisco.com> <82D5D06C-07BE-495B-90E4-A51E8C7CB438@nostrum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance@tools.ietf.org, "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>, SIPCORE Chairs <sipcore-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:08:27 -0000

At 09:48 PM 3/9/2011, Robert Sparks wrote:
>Hi James -
>
>I spotted one thing below that got mangled before I sent it

I saw that when I glanced initially. I figured I'd ask about it once 
I dove into the edit. Thanks for correcting before I got into it.

James

>- here's the correction:
>
>On Mar 9, 2011, at 6:20 PM, James M. Polk wrote:
>
> > Robert
> >
> > Thanks for the scrubbing.
> >
> > These will be part of the post WGLC version.
> >
> > James
> >
> > At 02:45 PM 3/9/2011, Robert Sparks wrote:
> >> There are a couple of larger and several small things to also 
> address in this document before requesting publication.
> >>
> >> The larger things:
><snip/>
> >>
> >> Here are the smaller things.
> >> I've listed these in as close to document order as I could
><snip/>
> >>
> >> 2) In section 4.1, I suggest replacing
> >> OLD: A Geolocation header field MUST have at least one header-value.
> >> with
> >> NEW: A Geolocation header field MUST have at least on
> >>
>
>That got truncated somehow before I sent it. It should have said:
>
>NEW: A Geolocation header field MUST have at least one locationValue.
>
>RjS

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email