Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 10 March 2011 03:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161E23A67F7 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:47:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3drM5WOhTeSH for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:47:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1AE3A67D6 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:47:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.105] (pool-173-57-105-99.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [173.57.105.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2A3mknI071051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:48:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <201103100020.p2A0KbV6024147@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:48:46 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <82D5D06C-07BE-495B-90E4-A51E8C7CB438@nostrum.com>
References: <4D6C31DC.80005@nostrum.com> <C7E060E7-9B2E-4FB3-9600-0A2B7776B403@nostrum.com> <201103100020.p2A0KbV6024147@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 173.57.105.99 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance@tools.ietf.org, "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>, SIPCORE Chairs <sipcore-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:47:33 -0000

Hi James -

I spotted one thing below that got mangled before I sent it - here's the correction:

On Mar 9, 2011, at 6:20 PM, James M. Polk wrote:

> Robert
> 
> Thanks for the scrubbing.
> 
> These will be part of the post WGLC version.
> 
> James
> 
> At 02:45 PM 3/9/2011, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> There are a couple of larger and several small things to also address in this document before requesting publication.
>> 
>> The larger things:
<snip/>
>> 
>> Here are the smaller things.
>> I've listed these in as close to document order as I could
<snip/>
>> 
>> 2) In section 4.1, I suggest replacing
>> OLD: A Geolocation header field MUST have at least one header-value.
>> with
>> NEW: A Geolocation header field MUST have at least on
>> 

That got truncated somehow before I sent it. It should have said:

NEW: A Geolocation header field MUST have at least one locationValue.

RjS