Re: [sipcore] location conveyance looks good

["Thomson, Martin" <[e-mail]>]

On 2010-10-27 at 15:29:55, James M. Polk wrote:
> >and the serial nature Figure 2 is a little mysterious to me
> 
> if I send you a SIP request with a location URI, you need to be able
> to dereference it (or at least try) before you accept the SIP
> request. I know it'll add a bit of time to the 200 OK, but that will
> allow confirmation of location delievery - which isn't the location
> URI, but the location value itself (i.e., the PIDF-LO). If the
> dereference fails after you've sent me a 200 OK, how can you possibly
> tell me that there was something wrong with my delivery of location to
> you?

I can live with that.  It all depends on whether the 200 is contingent on being able to dereference.  I imagine that if this is just a MESSAGE and the location isn't actually needed to process the request, you could send the 200 beforehand, but then you probably don't need the Geolocation header either.