Re: [Slim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-slim-multilangcontent-06.txt

Thanks Doug.

The only things I have concerns about are:
 - In the Introduction, I reference the real-time I-D but should it really
refer to the RFC number of the real-time document? If so, this means that
the non-real-time document cannot be published until the real-time document
has an RFC number assigned which ties the two together in terms of
readiness to publish. I believe that Randall has done the same from his
document.
 - I use the future tense in the IANA Considerations section (eg. The
multipart/multilingual MIME type *will* be registered). Is this OK?

Does anyone have any suggestions or comments on these two?

Nik.

On 14 October 2016 at 17:04, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:

> I read through this draft and did not find anything I felt was in need
> of improvement.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> SLIM mailing list
> SLIM@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim
>

-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple Language Content Type Internet Draft:

<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tomkinson-multilangcontent/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-slim-multilangcontent/
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tomkinson-slim-multilangcontent/>

-----------------------------------------------------------------