Re: [smartpowerdir] SmartGrid and the IETF WG EMAN

Fred Baker <> Thu, 06 January 2011 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FFE3A6C4F for <>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:25:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <MxhEDXDtw6gT>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Amavis-Alert: BANNED, message contains part: multipart/mixed | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation, .zip, Talk-NIST-Smart-Grid-Standards-Activities-Globcom2010.pptx | .wmf, ppt/media/image12.wmf
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (defanged) by
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MxhEDXDtw6gT for <>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:25:21 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1294331122-24159-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29D13A6C2F for <>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:25:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2011 16:26:54 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p06GOSqh003547; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 16:24:33 GMT
Received: from [] by (PGP Universal service); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:24:34 -0800
From: Fred Baker <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:24:18 -0800
Message-Id: <>
References: <>
To: Benoit Claise <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: Ross Callon <>, "william.polk@NIST.GOV Polk" <william.polk@NIST.GOV>, David Su <>, IETF SmartPower Directorate <>
Subject: Re: [smartpowerdir] SmartGrid and the IETF WG EMAN
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Members of the Smart Power Directorate <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:25:24 -0000

WARNING: contains banned part
--- Begin Message ---
On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Regarding a liaison from the IETF to NIST, don't we have something in place, Fred? I don't see anything at Next question. Do we need something specific for EMAN? As we concluded, EMAN is just one piece of the puzzle

What we have in place is that Ross Callon and I are considered liaison managers by the IAB, we have a directorate in place, and we talk with each other. If NIST wants a more formal relationship, it will be some expansion of that. Tim Polk can be a party to making that happen. However, I didn't know NIST wanted a more formal relationship?

> Btw, I would appreciate if you could forward me your presentation, which gives a good summary of all the smargrid problems, as smartgrid means different things for different people.

I copied the presentation on this, for the benefit of those added to the CC line.
--- End Message ---