Re: [smartpowerdir] SmartGrid and the IETF WG EMAN

Fred Baker <Fred@cisco.com> Thu, 06 January 2011 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FFE3A6C4F for <smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:25:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <MxhEDXDtw6gT>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BANNED, message contains part: multipart/mixed | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation, .zip, Talk-NIST-Smart-Grid-Standards-Activities-Globcom2010.pptx | .wmf, ppt/media/image12.wmf
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (defanged) by core3.amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MxhEDXDtw6gT for <smartpowerdir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:25:21 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1294331122-24159-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29D13A6C2F for <smartpowerdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:25:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2011 16:26:54 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com [10.32.244.218]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p06GOSqh003547; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 16:24:33 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:24:34 -0800
From: Fred Baker <Fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D016742.3050902@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:24:18 -0800
Message-Id: <27D53E26-890A-4C5C-9CB5-41910D600F28@cisco.com>
References: <4D016742.3050902@cisco.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "william.polk@NIST.GOV Polk" <william.polk@NIST.GOV>, David Su <david.su@nist.gov>, IETF SmartPower Directorate <smartpowerdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [smartpowerdir] SmartGrid and the IETF WG EMAN
X-BeenThere: smartpowerdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Members of the Smart Power Directorate <smartpowerdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpowerdir>, <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartpowerdir>
List-Post: <mailto:smartpowerdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpowerdir>, <mailto:smartpowerdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:25:24 -0000

WARNING: contains banned part
--- Begin Message ---
On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Regarding a liaison from the IETF to NIST, don't we have something in place, Fred? I don't see anything at https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/ Next question. Do we need something specific for EMAN? As we concluded, EMAN is just one piece of the puzzle

What we have in place is that Ross Callon and I are considered liaison managers by the IAB, we have a directorate in place, and we talk with each other. If NIST wants a more formal relationship, it will be some expansion of that. Tim Polk can be a party to making that happen. However, I didn't know NIST wanted a more formal relationship?

> Btw, I would appreciate if you could forward me your presentation, which gives a good summary of all the smargrid problems, as smartgrid means different things for different people.

I copied the presentation on this, for the benefit of those added to the CC line.
--- End Message ---