IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Snac] Re: What is the timeline for draft-ietf-snac-simple (causing several MISSREF in 6MAN WG) ?

Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net> Tue, 05 May 2026 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
X-Original-To: snac@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: snac@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF0BE96A1CC for <snac@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 11:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778004374; bh=w/+RzHG/hTvMgPcXkFWO8PtF7U8ajcp62QFydmIEdfE=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc; b=F/mb+o+UffknQY8S3CANaVFxSmFYZ2wwfyT41ELzE1RAcv0DL7iUloNXurxOUJ+Ov /GXKyQD0bL8wuR83Qh3E8LwxKB2KwolfXfnP1MibD82fij6/3mlkKmI41Z0BU5fNgF BQrv1DjOLra0O5qxd5YsFKihdlFCH1uxSluah/0o=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=forwardingplane.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hV-KnLkbzp6v for <snac@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 11:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02549E96A125 for <snac@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 11:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-50fb8e9a4edso67483461cf.1 for <snac@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 May 2026 11:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1778004346; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; b=SvGLFMWfdvJN+i5JArWoJZCaiT1DJC2/u/rkEkSbm/gW5NQ/aivyc6oQmtZAvOCjqB s68SX++zhboe3MjZJOpGb72okTOuLwZJuBFoXyFXuuMqRDKXN5BKBsN+A2o2zEbPRHpv DL0U7ja7kduESUbmZMMrQ4Dg2Qv8NiQwuGQqGRICXnm0C1x00EP/4++bGgn1ZIvIbWk+ SM6jJQNGpctP+GHiPDZ8dKQM85ri92X1Eomh0/i3jXFw3gMYmZsAftVoSdBzbrEaETiE Nvra63pG2Um1gg+H7EuLfBq1ZLyu6qN4NilG+kBHbmHEbbZyxY4Mb4sNyhdRjGlTEVYm reWQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=DIM+9zGATNSnW3Hs2YsfEVKjFu4c9AxITs6BzCH0QnM=; fh=RvzYgERDJPQZPH2qw6CAmFKXXwEjwa0vKyN2bwmxUws=; b=lY5GnC+OI7oFnroavJcaEl0YamO61bg3ciBT4YZRdJqd5jvSTEdONWCcGiZzMO74Uw QiU7KOfYIp4eu7RMX0kbXdQPH3TMw2byKL9WmycMcYYBR9YlAgbOfHWqvJMzKe34WtPV 7e2w6fKaOfoe14/eSvTPQmmFaqsw8HpJpuWhsJn+o8TIZBJKgmezSRlbfQO/HuaAkqYz 4g9Mr7MdKQUgWbvZuh42HSCos4W9oGvqdSOjcwxgZOTADv1lLrlpvyKyoZaXTkbwvzeJ A1Wxx2eWPPNMmsjvsU35oUGb8tVTHeYyqlKfwbVT/9iRGvhcOe+h6Y8VkETFMoZaTIn+ BdnQ==; darn=ietf.org
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=forwardingplane.net; s=google; t=1778004346; x=1778609146; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DIM+9zGATNSnW3Hs2YsfEVKjFu4c9AxITs6BzCH0QnM=; b=eeMXKuOeeHQkAC7gt2BzZpyFRGbvhLiAV7Bju/wktwlij6mLaJBL+G93LDVdwDuQ7p bbNWAw1PhDT48uCt3vOTzcD6lneRGGDxbzCDTbTxM9OhZIWsYHf0oeteDcAEyZ3EKiHg NWbrYe2+0P7Toy9lZFX+zqlmsn03CXHRLAA58=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778004346; x=1778609146; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DIM+9zGATNSnW3Hs2YsfEVKjFu4c9AxITs6BzCH0QnM=; b=Cp/2zbAs1TW8c/bVSEfLFvsOXxGwrhynPIlnd/74pku5WOspdNJiHTqXKa8lwYxLFh QUzFKT+Y+mKinDjACiu4LjaoiXrdfniKhmaZ6wfsjm44qDo+ncpOnnAV0WCGg1VxBdJw cooXT1+susQb0ftMDLUzgDqW5OBGd8Pd2urCJVKFrz7swsLnzrcmtykyHNnXwW268zjK +bhLQxhbWPkwFZno+Kolu6b5i8DVTH+laJI0SovwE8fTYIPbtfy/cKymaE/yg4DfPFpN wpe2f6kZliyHot9MU9k39l4LRubVTf0yRhW8jCfX38EQBWcqbQBzusmhLJkS5UyOsHvK 0R+w==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ8Ef1lCyWvtSQ0bjBD5yKGVV6RSWrvAFpO52ok7GCA1X4KvS5uKxqFacHmhm5P90V9V+06A@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzfIcD/4VPKJgM5TZF4KLo3Ac3Kyhuzg2SOSkSGfLhubMRZED6Z nIfMC7FYB6jxRFxhevJn5Korjq5ltKiVhcxfVLrU2IXqK3bfNq4Pl66aSJp41g407mrQB7gkPr7 /FcmWKh6EGAHPQ6KpuNUNVqL4eNvt5PJYDjxk6yoi
X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiev6pHUqZlr55X6OAkcsrxfROgfuBAzVp80BOlYW5yCj7QXs20u8b1UqxSFROLK Mxr9l0dmzqeh2bO4Ii6RXv1oXrUaW8B2oCkgwb4a7SrFpjQQt/QxhuO12hXsz04++EAQW7bmwjS ynKaWUG5C6yobnioGvGA1Fpz2EOvb5Z2K2h1HJzr19Kq/8NVAr4cMt7eS6DsWOTPio3ca0Q17DF hEnAkqW+O2c6T/sqZtNHwBsFkISm1yuAg/0+oC9Pzq2I6ZrGTM5UDuq4sSm6YdXmiXvK2KKugNG wqkMkzY92KlfngO7o3riSoec2PLrQ51Lf3sA5vHfjgm4Z8eZ/OSOG6I+XyMSgt6hK4HsP7GfKeg pA3yJB0lTNZdF9wbscB+bWEvqu1D+TqTejlXz
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:11d3:b0:509:3c8c:23f7 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-51461fa5937mr1176071cf.30.1778004346312; Tue, 05 May 2026 11:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH0PR11MB49665360922DCB68C1EB1EC0A9AAA@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <cb481ce6-2350-4e2b-a884-75eb3dd2b322@app.fastmail.com> <PH0PR11MB4966F05D9D76E02E2016DDBEA9AAA@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAFhLL-Y60LSfORynB0GbWa2EAgzX-wTQk+KkkdMjj14Js33Yqg@mail.gmail.com> <PH0PR11MB4966DCCE2271CE40683D436CA97AA@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <edfedb31-77f9-412b-891a-794607599035@iotconsultancy.nl> <PH0PR11MB4966C2DA83CC374239C9F7E9A94EA@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <a9bafa15-5bab-4778-8378-b1c65bfba73d@iotconsultancy.nl> <67716A6D-0E76-40C1-9931-6327BEB6FF59@fugue.com> <PH0PR11MB4966474C85C1537FFC533C96A952A@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB4966474C85C1537FFC533C96A952A@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 13:05:33 -0500
X-Gm-Features: AVHnY4JoOqzVd2sXC_qrrx6pxoQGxMj5gcfIXGoZTxicO8ZVdlBlZHlQDc4DpHU
Message-ID: <CACMsEX-7gep7UNpVECqPynTdvZayFJYcv_zmasQREbt4MhqucA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MailFrom: buraglio@forwardingplane.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: max-recipients
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
Message-ID-Hash: 2ACGOMWXQMXNJJW3U3627FSTBBBS3O36
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2ACGOMWXQMXNJJW3U3627FSTBBBS3O36
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 May 2026 14:28:28 -0700
CC: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, Darren Dukes <ddukesietf@gmail.com>, "David (Zhe) Lou" <zhe.lou@huawei.com>, "snac@ietf.org" <snac@ietf.org>, Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Snac] Re: What is the timeline for draft-ietf-snac-simple (causing several MISSREF in 6MAN WG) ?
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussing problems relating to the automatic connection of stub networks to existing infrastructure networks. " <snac.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/snac/ZT4dIMlU7a77j_CWP1dnzim7ANQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/snac>
List-Help: <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:snac-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:snac@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:snac-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:snac-leave@ietf.org>

Circling back around on this - did we ever get some closure on the
SNAC dependency tree? I believe there was hope for something in April
to resolve the MISREF. Anything we can do to help?

nb

On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 6:08 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have requested the IESG to approve the change proposed below by Ted on next IESG telechat, i.e., Thursday 2nd of April. Then, Jonathan can submit a revised I-D.
>
> Nevertheless, I am requesting the SNAC chairs to schedule a virtual interim meeting in April to finalise the draft-ietf-snac-simple I-D and initiate a WG Last Call shortly after this interim. My understanding is that the I-D is 99% perfect and there are very few RFC that are 100% perfect (e.g., nearly 10,000 RFCs and only 103 STDs).
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
> From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
> Date: Wednesday, 18 March 2026 at 09:51
> To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
> Cc: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>, Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, snac@ietf.org <snac@ietf.org>, Jonathan Hui <jonhui@google.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update@ietf.org <draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update@ietf.org>, Darren Dukes <ddukesietf@gmail.com>, David (Zhe) Lou <zhe.lou@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [Snac] What is the timeline for draft-ietf-snac-simple (causing several MISSREF in 6MAN WG) ?
>
> On Mar 18, 2026, at 09:26, Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
>
> "The SNAC router flag with value '1' is to be used only by SNAC routers. A future specification will define the operation of a SNAC router. For example, [I-D.ietf-snac-simple] may be such a specification.
> Any router that is not operating as a SNAC router MUST set the SNAC router flag to '0'."
>
>
> I would say it more like this:
>
> The SNAC router flag with value '1' is reserved for use by SNAC routers. The definition of what a SNAC router and when a SNAC router sets this flag is is out of scope for this document.  The SNAC router specification work in progress can be seen here: [I-D.ietf.snac-simple].
>
> I.e., no need to be prognosticate.
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status