[Snac] Re: What is the timeline for draft-ietf-snac-simple (causing several MISSREF in 6MAN WG) ?

[Darren Dukes <[e-mail]>]

You are both correct.

We (the chairs) will initiate the last call once the authors signal the
last major issues are resolved and the chairs will note the minor issues as
we enter wglc as an input to last call completion.

We are close.

Darren

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 3:48 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Ted,
>
> Thanks for the update. Indeed, I remembered that you would be busy after
> IETF-124, but did not remember until when ;-)
>
> If you manage to close all the issues this week, then I will suggest to
> the SNAC chairs to start the WGLC while you are "away" as the WGLC duration
> will match your "away from keyboard" duration. But this is up to the chairs
> to initiate the WGLC of course in agreement with the authors & WG.
>
> Ik wens U veel geluk met Uw Nederlands Boot Camp 😉
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
> *From: *Ted Lemon <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 16 December 2025 at 09:21
> *To: *Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <
> [e-mail]>, Jonathan Hui <[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *[e-mail] <[e-mail]>, Bob Hinden <
> [e-mail]>, Jen Linkova <[e-mail]>,
> [e-mail] <
> [e-mail]>
> *Subject: *Re: What is the timeline for draft-ietf-snac-simple (causing
> several MISSREF in 6MAN WG) ?
>
> I remember telling you we had a bunch of work to complete that I probably
> couldn’t do until, coincidentally, this week. This week I should have time
> to close the remaining issues. I will then be on vacation for three weeks
> (one week of Dutch language boot camp in January). So if there is a wglc, I
> think it would make more sense to start it after I get back. I’m sorry
> that’s not the timeline you were hoping for but hopefully it will still
> work.
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025, at 8:53 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>
> Jonathan, Ted, and SNAC WG,
>
> At IETF-124 there was a great hope and expectation that
> draft-ietf-snac-simple would have go through the WGLC before end of 2025.
> It is obviously not yet the case.
>
> It is not only about the SNAC WG but also in another WG: 6MAN where two
> drafts are waiting for snap-simple as it is a normative reference, see the
> RFC editor cluster C525 [1]
>
>    - draft-ietf-6man-snac-router-ra-flag
>    - draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update (and this one is important for 6MAN)
>
>
> The last email about snap-simple is dated 21st of November, nearly 1 month
> ago, i.e., it seems that there are no open hard issues anymore: "Perfect is
> the enemy of good"
>
> And being so late in the year with many of us taking some days off, the
> WGLC would at least extend more than the usual 3 weeks, i.e., ending in
> January.
>
> How far are we from asking the WGLC ?
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
> [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C525
>
>
>
> --
> Snac mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>