Re: [Snac] I-D Action: draft-ietf-snac-simple-00.txt

[Florian Obser <[e-mail]>]

5.2.2 states:
|   If IPv6 prefix delegation is available, which implies that IPv6
|   service is also available on the infrastructure link, then the stub
|   router MAY use IPv6 prefix delegation to acquire a prefix to
|   advertise on the stub network, rather than allocating one out of its
|   ULA prefix.

and 5.2.3:
|   Therefore, when DHCPv6-PD is available, the stub router MUST use DHCPv6
|   PD rather than its own prefix.

That's contradictory, I suppose 5.2.2 should say:
|   If IPv6 prefix delegation is available, which implies that IPv6
|   service is also available on the infrastructure link, then the stub
|   router MUST use IPv6 prefix delegation to acquire a prefix to
|   advertise on the stub network, rather than allocating one out of its
|   ULA prefix.

Or maybe just drop the last paragraph from 5.2.2 entirely.

-- 
In my defence, I have been left unsupervised.