Re: Embedded tables
Bhaskar_Bhar <bhar@duettech.com> Wed, 09 April 1997 06:20 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa10415; 9 Apr 97 2:20 EDT
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03280; 9 Apr 97 2:20 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id CAA14789 for snmpv2-outgoing; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 02:05:32 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: Duet Technologies
Alert: Domain crosscheck.com will now be known as duettech.com
From: Bhaskar_Bhar <bhar@duettech.com>
Message-Id: <9704090543.AA02676@gina.snt.com>
Subject: Re: Embedded tables
To: Edward Sun <sun@zso.dec.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 11:13:45 -0000
Cc: snmpv2@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <334ACDCD.794B@zso.dec.com>; from "Edward Sun" at Apr 08, 97 3:59 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL7]
Sender: owner-snmpv2@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi,
The RFC is 1902, it does not encourage the usage, but
merely states its usage. refer to sections 7.1.12, 7.7 & 7.8
- Bhaskar Bhar
>
> I'm reading a MIB which has a table embedded inside of another
> table. This is my first time reading this type of the table
> structure. Can someone tell me which RFC states this usage?
> Is it actually allowed or encouraged to use as so?
>
***************************************************************************
_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ | Bhaskar Bhar
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ | Network Management Group
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ | Duet Technologies India
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ | email: bhar@duettech.com
_/_/_/ /_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/ | http://www.duettech.com
***************************************************************************
- Embedded tables Edward Sun
- Re: Embedded tables Bhaskar_Bhar
- Re: Embedded tables ANDREASSON
- Re: Embedded tables ANDREASSON
- Re: Embedded tables owner-snmpv2
- Re: Embedded tables Bhaskar_Bhar
- Re: Embedded tables David Perkins