Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 09 April 2013 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CFD21F97D8 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWi7gXaUek2M for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [198.137.202.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636F421F97D3 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1D45F5E; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s= selector1; bh=IP5dzKsn8Jsa++pqkMKT36jCRis=; b=asRWKCU5ZOKLWOOF1F 4qf4aiUb1MEuqeSEwM/eXjFCy2wz3aDbFWDZADErsb/39Q5WeF89PlJsZfZZwBmJ shKjVntemF5fPd37sKtMnkHa9dSv7de3QklWBavI5MOELpqgS86VqodyT+YD+jEH SLHXO8nq7X7rerzkKTJJIz73w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= selector1; b=BnZRxEW4a7umClKvsVKuqDBDIzlKI4whL01gYxGZ3Ks804aHb82 ivALpAr9hwHig9MnuIvCp+3+9lRgX4si/TbEuRrGqpBFoFJnXiDC3ou1hH+a3n8K +WQ3DptHn+9Npz/j7slQG2O083UNo1jDnTUMeE3NOgx4/dLbqVzT4gKU=
Received: from dhcp-10-61-98-157.cisco.com (64-103-25-233.cisco.com [64.103.25.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CE025F5A; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <5163FBC3.3040602@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:14:45 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <409980DC-2EDB-464F-9E12-E69CBF81268D@employees.org>
References: <51633480.8070209@gmail.com> <28533DEA-0DD3-43DD-9CA4-929B0DBA9BDD@employees.org> <5163FBC3.3040602@gmail.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: Softwires <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:14:57 -0000

Tom,

> OK, how about this for the complete paragraph:
> 
>   "By default, the MAP subnetwork identifier is the first subnetwork within the End-user IPv6 prefix (all bits set to zero). An alternative subnetwork value MAY be configured. All nodes within a MAP domain MUST be configured to use the same value of the subnetwork identifier."

I like that text.

> I think that captures the intent. However, I see a possible difficulty: differing lengths of the End-user IPv6 prefix for different CEs. We have to add two conditions:
> 
> -- the configured subnetwork identifier is at least
>            64 - min (n + o)
> bits long, where the minimization is taken over all FMRs in the domain
> 
> -- the subnetwork identifier used with a given calculated End-user IPv6 prefix uses the right-most (64 - (n + o)) bits of the configured subnetwork identifier, where (n + o) is taken from the FMR used for the calculation.
> 
> Seems simpler just to restrict to the all-zeros value, but please comment.

I can't see how different End-user IPv6 prefix lengths within a domain can work.

cheers,
Ole