Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix
Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 09 April 2013 10:51 UTC
Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111E021F8FDF for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 03:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Suvmtr6i4x7g for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 03:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C3221F8FC6 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 03:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggFAFTxY1GQ/khN/2dsb2JhbABRgwbBd4ESFnSCHwEBBAE6PwULC0ZXBoghBq4VkDuObzMHgmBhA6gBgw06
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,438,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="152680121"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2013 10:51:13 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-96-164.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-96-164.cisco.com [10.61.96.164]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r39ApAfn024526 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:51:11 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <51633480.8070209@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:51:10 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <28533DEA-0DD3-43DD-9CA4-929B0DBA9BDD@employees.org>
References: <51633480.8070209@gmail.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: Softwires <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:51:19 -0000
Tom, > In Section 5.2 of -map-05, there is the paragraph: > > The MAP subnet ID is defined to be the first subnet (all bits set to > zero). Unless configured differently, a MAP node MUST reserve the > first IPv6 prefix in an End-user IPv6 prefix for the purpose of MAP. > > Question: does the second sentence say anything different from the first one? > > Question: if the MAP node is configured differently, how will other nodes be able to synthesize its MAP IPv6 address from the FMR? all nodes within the domain must use the same subnet-id. perhaps we could make that clearer. cheers, Ole
- [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Tom Taylor
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Ole Troan
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Tom Taylor
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Ole Troan
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Tom Taylor
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Ole Troan
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Tom Taylor
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Ole Troan
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Tom Taylor
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix Ole Troan
- Re: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix B.Nagaraj