[Softwires] 答复: Review of draft-sun-softwire-yang-02

[Qin Wu <[e-mail]>]

发件人: Ian Farrer [mailto:[e-mail]]
发送时间: 2015年3月13日 1:13
收件人: Qin Wu
抄送: [e-mail]
主题: Re: [Softwires] Review of draft-sun-softwire-yang-02

Hi Qin,

Thanks for your comments. Please see inline.

Cheers,
Ian

On 12 Mar 2015, at 08:53, Qin Wu <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Dear all,
I have read this document and think the softwire yang model is needed for the configuration and management of Softwire BRs and CPEs.
A few comments below:
In section 3.2, why the binding-ipv6-addr and binding-ipv6-prefix are both contained in the binding-table?

[if] The intention here is to allow for the binding table to be specified in one of two ways, either with an explicit /128 or a /64 with the IID automatically constructed from the IPv4 address and port set.

Looking at the model again, the way that it is currently defined is wrong. Here’s an updated section of the model that should achieve the above:


   |     +--rw (binding-v6info)

   |     |  +—:(ipv6addr)

   |     |  |  +--rw binding-ipv6-addr    inet:ipv6-address

   |     |  +—:(ipv6pref)

   |     |     +--rw binding-ipv6-prefix  inet:ipv6-prefix

[Qin]: Based on the above clarification, I think binding-ipv6-addr and binding-ipv6-prefix can not coexist at the same time, both binding-ipv6-addr and binding-ipv6-prefix should be optional leaf or choice, right?

   |     +--rw (binding-v6info)?

   |     |  +—:(ipv6addr)

   |     |  |  +--rw binding-ipv6-addr?    inet:ipv6-address

   |     |  +—:(ipv6pref)

   |     |     +--rw binding-ipv6-prefix?  inet:ipv6-prefix