IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Softwires] Review of draft-sun-softwire-yang-02

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 12 March 2015 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88061A8AA3 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FqFzjGRItBfU for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FDCA1A8AA1 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BQD74565; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:53:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:53:40 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.146]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:53:35 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-sun-softwire-yang-02
Thread-Index: AQHQXJmkDQ/qp1WJBEiN/EMW+LGWxA==
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:53:35 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846E1199@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.180]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846E1199nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/qxfqhWRZAHhmbFNWjZGbvISJfh0>
Subject: [Softwires] Review of draft-sun-softwire-yang-02
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:53:44 -0000

Dear all,
I have read this document and think the softwire yang model is needed for the configuration and management of Softwire BRs and CPEs.
A few comments below:
In section 3.2, why the binding-ipv6-addr and binding-ipv6-prefix are both contained in the binding-table?
In section 1.1, in RFC6087, I don't see the definitions of the symbols used in these diagrams. Is the reference RFC6087 correct?
For the title of "2.3 Lightweight 4over6 lwB4", I think "lwB4" should be uppercase to get consistent with "ATFR".

-Qin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email