Re: [Softwires] [softwire]One of the remaining issues in the softwiremulticast.

I agree. Since DS-lite has begun being trialed or deployed by some carriers,including China Telecom, It can be envisaged that some multicast-related services, such as IPTV, will mirgrate to softwire platform, softwire-multicast series documents should be advanced to meet the future deployment requirements.

Thanks

Chongfeng

Sent from my iPhone

> On 2014年9月3日, at 9:23, meng.wei2@zte.com.cn wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi, all 
>   I forgot to attach the link. The link is as below. 
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext/?include_text=1 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Wei 
> 
> 
> "Softwires" <softwires-bounces@ietf.org>  2014/09/02 17:37:53:
> 
> > 
> > Hi Softwirers， 
> >     There are some softwire technologies already in the WG, and generally, 
> > there also need some accompanying documents to help the primary technology 
> > be implemented flawlessly. 
> >     So far, there are some primary documents, DHCP Option documents and 
> > RADIUS Option documents shown as below. 
> >     As can be seen from the chart, softwire-multicast series is not complete. 
> > These documents all had been adopted as WG doc or became RFCs except draft- 
> > hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-05. 
> > 
> > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
> > | primary documents   |    DHCP Option         |    RADIUS Option       | 
> > +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> > |    RFC 6333         |     RFC 6334           |    RFC 6519            | 
> > |(draft-ietf-softwire | (draft-ietf-softwire-  |  (draft-ietf-softwire- | 
> > | -dual-stack-lite)   | ds-lite-tunnel-option) |  dslite-radius-ext)    | 
> > +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> > | draft-ietf-softwire | draft-ietf-softwire-   |  draft-ietf-softwire   | 
> > | -map                |  map-dhcp              |   -map-radius          | 
> > +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> > |    RFC 5969         | RFC 5969  section 7.1.1|   RFC 6930             | 
> > |(draft-ietf-softwire |                        |  (draft-ietf-softwire- | 
> > | -ipv6-6rd)          |                        |   6rd-radius-attrib)   | 
> > +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> > ............... 
> > +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> > | draft-ietf-softwire | draft-ietf-softwire-   |  draft-hu-softwire- | 
> > | -dslite-multicast & | multicast-prefix-option| multicast-radius-ext| 
> > | draft-ietf-softwire |                        |                        | 
> > | -mesh-multicast     |                        |                        | 
> > +---------------------+------------------------+------------------------+ 
> > 
> >     draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option & draft-hu-softwire-multicast-
> > radius-ext are companion documents. The former provides a method to carry 
> > "IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes" as a DHCPv6 
> > option. Likewise 
> > draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext provides a RADIUS option to carry the 
> > above attributes. 
> > 
> >     Is there anyone intereted in this topic? Any comments are welcome. 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Wei 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Softwires mailing list
> > Softwires@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires