Re: [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chen-softwire-4rd-u-comment-00.txt

[Maoke <[e-mail]>]

hi Behcet,

2012/4/10 Tina TSOU <[e-mail]>

>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 10:12 AM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Maoke,
> >
> > Thank you for your efforts in technical details of one specific
> > proposal on the table.
> >
> > However, I for one think that probably it is time to concentrate on
> > commonalities rather than the differences. As Alain indicated, these
> > proposals do have a lot of common points.
> >
>

that proposal is basically of a response to people's call for "describing
technical concerns in mind" about 4rd-U. commonality and difference is the
two sides of the same coin. if we don't understand what makes them exactly
different, we are also hard to understand how common they are. this
document is purposed in sharing such an understanding and therefore it
focuses only on the essential concerns -- the concerns regarding
architecture and protocol semantics.


> > Why don't (whoever) write a draft putting together all the common
> > points concentrating on CE to BR and abstracting out BIH, XLAT, etc.?
> > Such a draft can be of great value at this point, I think.
> That's MAP-D document.
> >
>

yes. as Tina points out, MAP deployment draft that we are working on plays
the role of clarifying the common deployment considerations with MAP
series. thanks!

best,
maoke


> > Regards,
> >
> > Behcet
> >
>
>