IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS Recharter Text

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 28 August 2017 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C273A132C47 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XZbdkzUgxLfN for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3EF8132C44 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5C7300568 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:14:03 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id MqmB780GPv-p for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9557F3004C3; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <B49550C5-2C66-47CD-8214-EDBD07813561@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4FF5252D-89A1-47FC-A210-92D70346DD5B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:14:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CADqLbz+FjqAjf8pr7Zf4ZYgAOLjqVBEg6g409-a_2=2PLVtwTg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
References: <3EC3EBBE-D17D-4A25-A61C-27872613FB4D@vigilsec.com> <02CCCC92-7487-444A-A14A-0CC0D4118104@vigilsec.com> <691aeea4-8b96-b0c9-6171-b9d06f414b46@openca.org> <2E78D706-3ED3-4596-8E86-2B5D3D6C365A@vigilsec.com> <942CF4F1-7495-4C23-A2C4-5F4E4124CFA2@akamai.com> <CADqLbz+FjqAjf8pr7Zf4ZYgAOLjqVBEg6g409-a_2=2PLVtwTg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/D7W8Z6owqF8SY0qkrhO2J_FSae0>
Subject: Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS Recharter Text
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:14:07 -0000

This definition applies to all work that will be considered by the LAMPS WG.  As I said, this is the definition that was used for the current items, and it will be used for any new topics as well.

Russ


> On Aug 28, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Do you mean Dr.Pala's suggestion or mine one? They are related in some way, but not equivalent.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com <mailto:rsalz@akamai.com>> wrote:
> OpenSSL is interested.
> 
> On 8/28/17, 10:07 AM, "Russ Housley" <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
> 
>     For the current items, "active support" meant that more than one party was willing to implement the RFC produced by the group.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email