IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS Recharter Text

Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com> Mon, 28 August 2017 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <beldmit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04306132C4B for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5v9OXCH8KcVc for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B4E132C41 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b14so13686556wme.0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EUsUdkwTOyhNQRfWLin9yiufnqwWZaS9797jt4FOMn8=; b=NARD9Gt1mP1RbQugE9ndFIe4qrM4U6ljPJwj3la8sVTdvwjAitSVk30n5HJpsNEoNH laPO6bYMiDqURZOIazFH3uX0LTJCBjxBC7+IEe23NzMYj36YWgr5GVd7161xUosOLB4k r8XVJ2/2mE6WCWo2UCOwPM05sCJa1DEiBzlTr1H6WoIoAScYWIEEM/flYa5L8Pgca/tf REmg7B6DR9n/PheiI8Dt8YQJSHnyu8+mDCb2xHXsnTbhUkv7c9PtyAqb1ga/UEPAfLTZ p7LKLfz6DF2ibe1+lCw2w1WqEN2V1ok+BlOW2nq02unWxIhvOhL5b5ND3TAzyNQZ03kt iAkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EUsUdkwTOyhNQRfWLin9yiufnqwWZaS9797jt4FOMn8=; b=cJWhiTbn/fp3ndPCH597/O5M5YzPeeLHlNpkTukdKfbz04+a79xxtf6xGhtZVVuJjf vXr2TMJ+BbSP3lTG7HdmAMNKUKT1ho4ZvlGUOlECUJtWcwSTSAkwLu8DU+13zPkh5yyv hgSw7ERrKD/Hv92pQi02y2SO8iRU6TTS2vQZYhmcotNqoRw8GgEqLV/pg7ZB+RPr01O6 zhQs5NXxsWUH/yZ3tHo7lWeJuKcwyusxL6TO20uYmwdSxVQLu/mJwM36GMGLlWLjLwkz PH0HkrNdoTUEqvBLSdU+ZQyA9zncymR/4E66p5rp2FKUFcJf/D+qbA7tK/XmyJmNdko3 ejgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5gsgGTj82+t4JRslaIjXJZ4aBCDzuqPEs+nJXiA0L9WyC1SIFFQ JHEXNfYJk+lVl+qQ0gk9BxFdqfgkmg==
X-Received: by 10.80.178.97 with SMTP id o88mr710506edd.209.1503932543034; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.143.3 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <942CF4F1-7495-4C23-A2C4-5F4E4124CFA2@akamai.com>
References: <3EC3EBBE-D17D-4A25-A61C-27872613FB4D@vigilsec.com> <02CCCC92-7487-444A-A14A-0CC0D4118104@vigilsec.com> <691aeea4-8b96-b0c9-6171-b9d06f414b46@openca.org> <2E78D706-3ED3-4596-8E86-2B5D3D6C365A@vigilsec.com> <942CF4F1-7495-4C23-A2C4-5F4E4124CFA2@akamai.com>
From: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:02:22 +0300
Message-ID: <CADqLbz+FjqAjf8pr7Zf4ZYgAOLjqVBEg6g409-a_2=2PLVtwTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, "Dr. Pala" <madwolf@openca.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c195c10fe69ee0557d1945d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/gSmdngi4sxRH5_nkjl1AJlOXa9Q>
Subject: Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS Recharter Text
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:02:27 -0000

Do you mean Dr.Pala's suggestion or mine one? They are related in some way,
but not equivalent.

Thank you!

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> OpenSSL is interested.
>
> On 8/28/17, 10:07 AM, "Russ Housley" <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>
>     For the current items, "active support" meant that more than one party
> was willing to implement the RFC produced by the group.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>



-- 
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email