IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] BoF in Berlin or what?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 14 June 2016 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A64212D14A for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qs2FiiUzJ33H for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678F312B064 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB4D30042D for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:50:07 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id pKaqMmvKkmIT for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.1.0.67] (csopen.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.52.39]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD7BD30025B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:50:05 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <57519BBB.8050604@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:50:05 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7255B25B-9278-461C-9480-D4326F63D37B@vigilsec.com>
References: <57519BBB.8050604@cs.tcd.ie>
To: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GyXm0sgki_zhNBSC4O6NpnMQm84>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] BoF in Berlin or what?
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:50:11 -0000

My understanding is that a one hour meeting slot for SPASM was approved for Berlin:

	https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/23XSrpv0Gc8knO8bU0MAwsGGXKY

We have two work items in the most recent charter:

1. Specify the way to include an i18n email address as a subject
   alternative name and an issuer alternative name.
  draft-melnikov-spasm-eai-addresses is a proposal in this space. 

2. Specify the way to use authenticated encryption in S/MIME. 
   draft-schaad-rfc5751-bis is a proposal in this space.

Can we count on Alexey and Jim to give status and open issues on these drafts?

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email