IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] BoF in Berlin or what?

Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com> Fri, 17 June 2016 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B57C12DC2C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10sN1BEiGT42 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1DE612B046 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u201so138097967oie.0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KUqeHABf/5SPG+8KHpF9JW3iUK3vkrB5gpfgSz6Ysqo=; b=f5F0PmZUxVEnatwQAi01UeGZOzyuTWfU5A8Eb3nsGovZEvFttftmHxxiyOz8lVp8zY abfdJrr363Buu7uBlkFbRofL4fnMFHWIbNaMw5FnmRvaY/iC6V3OHj+GMNeiW60BET62 xKoJ3p9QRVns8VJAPfdx+vjO+qRisOHIRDuTGGanhZ+YR/NWlWD9brg2RDDqvBGqpX61 UdoWO2r4lYw4kFtkuBBGqQHE+ujxI1FHp9evBLWkm9QiN3iNd0fAykV+iaA1V5+rQvNH xZ7LB1nDvIm+NHa7ou3dkCVImkVSr2e0NWljSYBo2ArxhefV2Mk9UT+NBRe8QaectvwO zr/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KUqeHABf/5SPG+8KHpF9JW3iUK3vkrB5gpfgSz6Ysqo=; b=Q6Q7biUJXdZbTAQimYs6+sgT+4mDp1TbvxrxwV2Y3xCKUeqSFlLI+wpbg6AScxW/TO 6QWosrYNpZLSRN7KsTUDcl5nKP83/K08q9jbemcEFnWrIYxlWn8zrPx7Ge41RnkHOqTS KdHFKngq0wEs8KY0ysfODbgwui/O23g+I7ykjHd1+byzvapujGPbELgVuBokh+PNZ8uL 0Ca4aGQXMFWnuO9UlnNklgy0k85DUIKjseCgKL9wWLxyugv1NwlJHsCqxPmPkkd24F5q 9YElqW9Qqjq3QfqUpR71P+yRX+PNA9QdDcdldPoc2qT+yOpALWFoPztiiY0zDeVRotzp iV3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJKStF0V/ErLylOQHoEqM51loMjxxyTiUNFgP8/JUL/vXENKIWs0IWz7I7LIRZ6UTATutr4hhJAyRG9LXt8
X-Received: by 10.202.225.8 with SMTP id y8mr2973196oig.192.1466205122967; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.27.139 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <02c101d1c8ea$515b85b0$f4129110$@augustcellars.com>
References: <57519BBB.8050604@cs.tcd.ie> <7255B25B-9278-461C-9480-D4326F63D37B@vigilsec.com> <CAAFsWK2xiZeJC-hzWBsCLR-Mqyqs5xUhLzCfWUxUyYuDdiQ8Qg@mail.gmail.com> <438E0183-E149-4580-B6C2-8D120E070E4C@vigilsec.com> <02c101d1c8ea$515b85b0$f4129110$@augustcellars.com>
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:12:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAFsWK0OaxwDp0xoawdArAMfgjX5JygcNWy1bEfpCpQ8FvVqag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cd17886124a0535817b9e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/RrljKHXbVqUgB8siCMxcvbPbVlU>
Cc: spasm@ietf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] BoF in Berlin or what?
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:12:05 -0000

That schedule looks good to me too.

-Wei

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:

> Given the constraints of a one-hour meeting, that looks reasonable.
>
> Jim
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Spasm [mailto:spasm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ Housley
> > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 12:16 PM
> > To: spasm@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Spasm] BoF in Berlin or what?
> >
> > Seing that SPASM has a one hour slot on the preliminary schedule and that
> > document authors have agreed to do status and open issue presentations, I
> > propose the following agenda.
> >
> >       SPASM WG Agenda
> >
> >       0)  Minutes, Jabber Scribe, Bluesheets
> >       1)  Agenda Bash
> >       2)  Status and open issues for draft-melnikov-spasm-eai-addresses
> >       3)  Status and open issues for draft-schaad-rfc5751-bis
> >       4)  WG document adoption
> >       5)  Wrap Up
> >
> > The 4th item will be dropped if the IESG has not chartered the SPASM WG
> in
> > time.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Russ
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spasm mailing list
> > Spasm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email