IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] BoF in Berlin or what?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 17 June 2016 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B333012DA1E for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o-WGW1efPNJy for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6E512DA1C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C949E300436 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id B735oLfSTTQb for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E108C300229 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAFsWK2xiZeJC-hzWBsCLR-Mqyqs5xUhLzCfWUxUyYuDdiQ8Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:16:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <438E0183-E149-4580-B6C2-8D120E070E4C@vigilsec.com>
References: <57519BBB.8050604@cs.tcd.ie> <7255B25B-9278-461C-9480-D4326F63D37B@vigilsec.com> <CAAFsWK2xiZeJC-hzWBsCLR-Mqyqs5xUhLzCfWUxUyYuDdiQ8Qg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/LChUGpQ72exuf2yHKhABt_PPfYA>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] BoF in Berlin or what?
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:16:28 -0000

Seing that SPASM has a one hour slot on the preliminary schedule and that document authors have agreed to do status and open issue presentations, I propose the following agenda…

	SPASM WG Agenda

	0)  Minutes, Jabber Scribe, Bluesheets
	1)  Agenda Bash
	2)  Status and open issues for draft-melnikov-spasm-eai-addresses
	3)  Status and open issues for draft-schaad-rfc5751-bis
	4)  WG document adoption
	5)  Wrap Up

The 4th item will be dropped if the IESG has not chartered the SPASM WG in time.

Thoughts?

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email