IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Request for review of revised RFC 5759

Michael Jenkins <mjjenki@tycho.ncsc.mil> Wed, 31 January 2018 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mjjenki@tycho.ncsc.mil>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B49A12FAAD for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:18:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YU-Nh22hmIb4 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from UCOL19PA11.eemsg.mail.mil (ucol19pa11.eemsg.mail.mil [214.24.24.84]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA1D12FABC for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:18:02 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,441,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217";a="435462360"
Received: from emsm-gh1-uea10.ncsc.mil ([214.29.60.2]) by UCOL19PA11.eemsg.mail.mil with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 31 Jan 2018 21:17:51 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,441,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217";a="8207162"
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23: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
X-IPAS-Result: A2CUAQAWMXJa/wHyM5BdGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJKeIFbhAiYUEYBAQaBNJldhUUCgk9XFQEBAQEBAQEBAgFqKII4JAGCRwEFI1YQCxgqAgJXBgEMCAEBiiQNqB2CJyaKRgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2EW4IVgQ+CWYMFgTCDUgEBgzWCZQWTWIZBigWVbJQtcJg1NSOBUDMaCDCCaIUUI4ojgjwBAQE
Received: from tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil ([144.51.242.1]) by EMSM-GH1-UEA10.NCSC.MIL with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2018 21:17:48 +0000
Received: from rd2ul-48143y.infosec.tycho.ncsc.mil (rd2ul-48143y [192.168.26.149]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0VLHks4008164; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:17:46 -0500
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Cc: "Zieglar, Lydia Q" <llziegl@nsa.gov>, "m.jenkins.364706+work@gmail.com" <m.jenkins.364706+work@gmail.com>
References: <863b6e71-c179-3856-9edf-28e8306031e4@tycho.ncsc.mil> <3B006823-7B2B-4438-8C7A-909C35F8B6C2@akamai.com>
From: Michael Jenkins <mjjenki@tycho.ncsc.mil>
Message-ID: <a4ff373b-4c91-3cca-ddf2-3609c4008b67@tycho.ncsc.mil>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:17:46 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3B006823-7B2B-4438-8C7A-909C35F8B6C2@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------38C779176266D46FAC766468"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/K7sm8Zf9eJ9SMmJKrQxqvdWCprc>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Request for review of revised RFC 5759
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:18:19 -0000

Sorry, I should have been clearer. A separate action (RFC) will be taken 
to move the older RFCs to Historical status. This I-D stands on its own.

Thanks Rich!

On 01/31/2018 04:15 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>   * As part of this process, the older RFCs will be moved to
>     Historical status, and we plan to publish new RFCs via the ISE. We
>     are seeking review and comment of the drafts prior to publication,
>     and so will be announcing the drafts on appropriate mail-lists as
>     we produce them.
>
>
> Interesting question.  I don’t think an independent RFC can 
> make-obsolete an existing WG RFC.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email