Re: [lamps] [Non-DoD Source] Request for review of revised RFC 5759

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 08 March 2018 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0C4127076 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:58:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dgWqt4B_meiW for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39B9C1201F8 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.47.60.100] (138-196.icannmeeting.org [199.91.196.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w28IvlDO049290 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:57:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 138-196.icannmeeting.org [199.91.196.138] claimed to be [10.47.60.100]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Michael Jenkins" <mjjenki@tycho.ncsc.mil>
Cc: spasm@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 14:58:15 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.10r5443)
Message-ID: <C5F9E80F-E5CA-49C6-B244-D9354ABE63EA@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <19dbe3c2-dd6b-5313-7663-e85aba7c65c3@tycho.ncsc.mil>
References: <863b6e71-c179-3856-9edf-28e8306031e4@tycho.ncsc.mil> <ABF94A28-87F1-40D3-942C-1CE2C5EEFF92@vpnc.org> <19dbe3c2-dd6b-5313-7663-e85aba7c65c3@tycho.ncsc.mil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/I7oPliGlGxQKRMfkYz5T55Tohqo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Non-DoD Source] Request for review of revised RFC 5759
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 18:58:21 -0000

Humorously, you have now caused a better URL for that document to 
appear. Your message is archived at:
     https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/e6Lprn5oXI4bFdP4SYAUhksMIh4
The attachment itself is at:
     https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/attach/spasm/pdf2BY7gK.pdf

According to the design of the mail archive, you should be able to use 
either of those URLs forever.

--Paul Hoffman