Re: [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk-05
Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 19 July 2019 23:47 UTC
Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB851200C4 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TRACKER_ID=0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8gkn5EzF8aIR for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0047120033 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x6JNlcOm007595; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:47:38 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu x6JNlcOm007595
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1563580058; bh=LM+mljsx2LtscnvqWb43hArtYMhD3XapwdQkgB/iwnU=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jDyNhZGVQ5luFWza3l82ETBUGfn/nVsaIIMtp9QSi+SJEUkQXMDv4ZgYJ2PztNTnz dNV7qUeMCJBdwKIx0REmF1gxipJ764UBuM+5/6MZ/LM4c8BRZ4TtFVnoz4OXtRsEdM OEHCoMDgzgnQrJQnebVK9laMAWmBbFxl66skrWAE=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x6JNlZHP023362; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:47:35 -0400
Received: from MARCHAND.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.251]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:47:34 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
CC: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk-05
Thread-Index: AdU8EX/wJ/esCf+5ROODUoLZZ3GXMAA2of4AAGgHecA=
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 23:47:34 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B33DBB8F@marchand>
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B33D5872@marchand> <8F78EFC7-1327-411D-AD08-707D6B3480E2@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <8F78EFC7-1327-411D-AD08-707D6B3480E2@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B33DBB8Fmarchand_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/SlGV1Qzu-awEwYDJkXj4fAZouy4>
Subject: Re: [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk-05
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 23:47:42 -0000
Hi Russ! Sounds good on all of the numbered items; and on waiting for all of the feedback from IETF LC to produce an update. Thanks, Roman From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 2:08 PM To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Cc: spasm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk-05 Roman: Thanks for the careful review. I will wait to see what other IETF Last Call comments come along before posting a revision. The following is my AD review of draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk-05. Given the substance of these comments, it can be handled with IETF LC comments. (1) Section 9. The object identifier is called "id-mod-cms-ori-psk-2017" in the IANA section (Section 9) but "id-mod-cms-ori-psk-2019" in the ASN.1 Module (Section 6). Seems like they should be the same. Good catch. I have changes it to id-mod-cms-ori-psk-2019. (2) Section B.1. This section does not list the plaintext content It is true. I'll add it, but it is the same as B.3. Alice encrypts the content using AES-256-GCM with the content- encryption key. The 12-octet nonce used is: dbaddecaf888cafebabeface The plaintext is: 48656c6c6f2c20776f726c6421 The resulting ciphertext is: fc6d6f823e3ed2d209d0c6ffcf The resulting 12-octet authentication tag is: 550260c42e5b29719426c1ff (3) Improved references: ** Section 1. Is there a citation that can be provided for the obvious "The invention of a large-scale quantum computer would pose a serious challenge for the cryptographic algorithms that are widely deployed today"? [S1994] Shor, P., "Algorithms for Quantum Computation: Discrete Logarithms and Factoring", Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1994, pp. 124-134. ** Section 1. Is there a citation that can be provided for "It is an open question whether or not it is feasible to build a large-scale quantum computer ...". Perhaps: [NAS2019] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, "Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects", The National Academies Press, DOI 10.17226/25196, 2019. Yes, I'll add that reference. ** Section 1. Is there a citation that can be provided for "there are longstanding concerns about undisclosed trapdoors in Diffie-Hellman paramters"? [FGHT2016] Fried, J., Gaudry, P., Heninger, N., and E. Thome, "A kilobit hidden SNFS discrete logarithm computation", Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/961, 2016. https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/961.pdf. (4) Editorial Nits ** Section 1. Recommend weakening the statement. s/invulnerable to an attacker/resistant to an attacker/ Yes, that is better. ** Section 1. Typo. s/Diffie-Hellamn/Diffie-Hellman/ Fixed. ** Section 3 and 4. Since Section 2 calls out that there two techniques, keyTransPSK and keyAgreePSK, should the section 3 and 4 titles be those names instead of the underlying CMS data structure names? Okay. The section titles have been changed. ** Section 5. Typo. s/ fo / of / Fixed. ** Section 5. Typo?. s/deines/identifies/ No, it should be "defines" ** Section 7. Typo. s/materail/material/ Fixed. ** Section 7. Typo. /an purpose/a purpose/ Fixed. ** Section 7. Typo. Consistently choose either "implementers" or "implementors" There were many more "implementers", so I went with that spelling. ** Section 7. I think it would be helpful to move the text on the ProVerif proof from the Acknowledgements up to the Security Considerations section Done. ** Appendix A/B. Multiple Typos. s/omited/omitted/g Fixed. (I found it in two places.) ** Appendix A.*. Mutiple Places. Typo. s/resutling/resulting/g Fixed. (I found it in four places.) Russ
- [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-w… Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-w… Roman Danyliw