IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 07 July 2021 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDAE3A076F for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bD_N-onFp5uj for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4947D3A076E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B78E300B96 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 17:23:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id aJ08mtRKtVg5 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 17:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ACC7300B2C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 17:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Message-Id: <F64E0098-A5F3-40A4-AFDD-42011A193A6F@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 17:23:52 -0400
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/WRcrf8UPqYLkbkV-ZYB67HfeL-g>
Subject: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 21:24:02 -0000

With the WG re-charter now complete, we are a bit tardy in asking this question.  We have already discussed this document at IETF 110, and there was no one speaking against adoption at that time.  This call is to confirm that is still the case.
 
Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this document as a WG document.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 21 July 2021.

For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email