IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance

Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> Thu, 08 July 2021 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188833A1160 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 04:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TL6ri_BqM1dl for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 04:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c0c:15fc::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A2E3A115D for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 04:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>) id 1m1SVI-000tn2-EA; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 13:47:40 +0200
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 13:47:39 +0200
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
cc: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <F64E0098-A5F3-40A4-AFDD-42011A193A6F@vigilsec.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2107081346170.208920@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
References: <F64E0098-A5F3-40A4-AFDD-42011A193A6F@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/_QjYh1utxF088R-jpefntTBI-cE>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 11:47:46 -0000

I support adopting this as a WG document.

cheers
  Bernie

On Wed, 7 Jul 2021, Russ Housley wrote:

> With the WG re-charter now complete, we are a bit tardy in asking this question.  We have already discussed this document at IETF 110, and there was no one speaking against adoption at that time.  This call is to confirm that is still the case.
>
> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this document as a WG document.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 21 July 2021.
>
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email