IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 22 July 2021 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4713A4B29 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QfUAVvejCFx for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 536673A4B2C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CDE300C09 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 11:54:03 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id T2mac_tA_ddt for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 11:54:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0D90300232 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 11:54:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 11:54:02 -0400
References: <F64E0098-A5F3-40A4-AFDD-42011A193A6F@vigilsec.com>
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <F64E0098-A5F3-40A4-AFDD-42011A193A6F@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <A74B73E5-978E-49F6-863A-DF6E7D5CE8AF@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/gY_ef-iX0v32lmD9Q4Ey7t1skWk>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:54:09 -0000

No one has spoken against adoption.  DKG, please post draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance once the I-D repository is open again.

Russ and Tim


> On Jul 7, 2021, at 5:23 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> With the WG re-charter now complete, we are a bit tardy in asking this question.  We have already discussed this document at IETF 110, and there was no one speaking against adoption at that time.  This call is to confirm that is still the case.
> 
> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this document as a WG document.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 21 July 2021.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email