IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [EXTERNAL] Re: [CMP Updates] Requesting a current CRL

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 08 October 2021 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610783A07EC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDP1YL1p9IPw for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E563A07D0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E1E300C57 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:51 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id omyIHPKNEVal for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3EAD300B19; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <B92F36D2-605F-4E60-A654-AA0F89E310CA@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A0741DAB-BDD4-4D1C-8D17-683E021CF391"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:40:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR10MB241865E9784CC03F81AA9D39FEB29@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Cc: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, John Gray <John.Gray@entrust.com>, David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
To: "Brockhaus, Hendrik" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>
References: <AM0PR10MB24181E0CB7F13C5969337F56FEB09@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <C81D6269-EA75-4A0F-9C47-63ED46BA43E0@vigilsec.com> <DM6PR11MB25853662F94B5B12933C23F9EAB09@DM6PR11MB2585.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR10MB24298128902B438BCAF406D4FEB19@VI1PR10MB2429.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <FD4EBC6E-77CE-4D96-8D9E-D929C27159D6@vigilsec.com> <AM0PR10MB2418E1DE7004C868C0E3AEA2FEB29@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <EDA2ACBF-E745-430A-A13F-A144B08125AC@vigilsec.com> <AM0PR10MB241887D39072B393C56FB28AFEB29@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <8D6D333A-14A3-4487-967F-CFCAC22D856C@vigilsec.com> <AM0PR10MB241865E9784CC03F81AA9D39FEB29@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/dYAX6IDlymON4KFTafmMtf19x_Y>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [EXTERNAL] Re: [CMP Updates] Requesting a current CRL
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 16:40:55 -0000


> On Oct 8, 2021, at 12:36 PM, Brockhaus, Hendrik <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com> wrote:
> 
> My question is, is it OK to reuse id-it-currentCrl together with id-it-crlThisUpdate like this
> 
>    GenMsg:    {id-it 6}, < absent >
>    GenRep:    {id-it 6}, CertificateList  |  < absent >

Yes, because <absent> is exactly the same response that would be given if {id-it 6} is unrecognized by the server.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email