IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-samples

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 30 April 2021 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58993A236C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 12:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWBbmNcesTvV for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 12:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D23E3A2368 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 12:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16021300AFC for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:14:09 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Uve7ueCVNmHU for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:14:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50656300C27 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:14:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.20\))
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:14:04 -0400
References: <F1531D47-B2AC-43BC-8EE2-897F2D9A0974@vigilsec.com>
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <F1531D47-B2AC-43BC-8EE2-897F2D9A0974@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <A9F9AA52-2350-4B27-8575-A61921B66D24@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/dmuk4PERIuLdGR0Jq0qLJxTAzok>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-samples
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:14:16 -0000

I heard support from several people, and I did not hear objections from anyone.  Please post an draft-ietf-lamps version of the document.

Russ



> On Apr 14, 2021, at 5:29 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Based on the advice from Roman during IETF 110, I do not think that a recharter is needed to adopt a document that contains a big pile of samples to help implementers.  The existing document is in support of work that is in the current charter, and it can be expanded if the IESG approves the re-charter text that has already been sent to them.
> 
> Should the LAMPS WG adopt draft-dkg-lamps-samples as the starting point for this work?
> 
> Please voice your support or raise concerns by 29 April 2021.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email