Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-samples

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 20 April 2021 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744693A10FE for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2PLAfhm5Wf_J for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652553A1100 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1618899576; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=pfio+CGW035k2zDCLk4SqYBEYTSaY1LOgBzO0l+umLE=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=MAzVDm+YcnA5/ZtjBkmAGoIV5ZGGzWJ/NFIwR5nSYI61JieGdPIdFyh7gi+VQkgEJVBGAG agIBhN7oIyL66bOC2zUmGQ34VCy7eT/DcSAKlqfSOU3/fQEsbtkO7A4Ee7TDhRxkXVL+LW jp6bWZPBgjdd4Jy74wqGZABN6xwyu7c=;
Received: from [192.168.0.29] ((unknown) [176.248.52.232]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <YH5ydgA0hLqb@waldorf.isode.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:19:36 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1531D47-B2AC-43BC-8EE2-897F2D9A0974@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:19:33 +0100
Cc: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <6F6C68A4-305F-4F0A-9C34-4C1900821C53@isode.com>
References: <F1531D47-B2AC-43BC-8EE2-897F2D9A0974@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18D70)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/y8u5cvhA9amPqxhvia5gQ5Bwp3E>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-samples
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 06:19:43 -0000

> On 14 Apr 2021, at 22:29, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Based on the advice from Roman during IETF 110, I do not think that a recharter is needed to adopt a document that contains a big pile of samples to help implementers.  The existing document is in support of work that is in the current charter, and it can be expanded if the IESG approves the re-charter text that has already been sent to them.
> 
> Should the LAMPS WG adopt draft-dkg-lamps-samples as the starting point for this work?

Yes.
> 
> Please voice your support or raise concerns by 29 April 2021.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm