Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 17 May 2018 20:00 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3CA1270B4 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkkIUOvfvICV for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x243.google.com (mail-oi0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0C0126B6E for <SPASM@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x243.google.com with SMTP id n65-v6so5123609oig.6 for <SPASM@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Qpcguy3XQ/8U86AuKtDS2JY6DrRsqS/K9RyPUwntzz8=; b=U7rhUw19OjP/Qdfcq6yiO3BbzlZS/4XF2kijDDf2IvECzcCmYnzd4T77v0snfUxCP8 RYkEIIv9g0aKKrePRZP3a+zMDGbTBoPESz/HWZjgitqxFlTmh2rOwr62UIia0wFe/TgX BM7A2840SwKzljkoZxJ5s0Ycj8+dn9VG2VCDUdT09fGGR5OEmLezl9LeN6qr6YJvuRC6 TJKP9dVRkW4nnJBl8H2QhavKX3MT3+QkHKBbE5hMD0KvaACqzVtoCj4mSSz3A/qx52/7 8utrYVX7YrBrSbuvyxFtkY6+l7ArPXqI+rE6UMnh14uuWOkf/jCXdwqxO5Jj4GRVP5yU /k7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Qpcguy3XQ/8U86AuKtDS2JY6DrRsqS/K9RyPUwntzz8=; b=VIwV2d+hHGOkBIhPjJ8Zp9uvTyYHHLTGPcCDrOGhuT5mZFVhTOKb/wOxHydHExahtK j+9SUB0fCupBvYB9ZiHg8BUQQtNiJJQTDsOmLhfiUBdbGDDJUbPhnzxpoCW9CIilBhut uHqcejLN43QlrSGPnXU07Y02Iq/aox4+zgc0ZHZFTvRDGSJBr5IMyyadlOGwiRhFPnRM UpQjqq8GFfsFINOMc5yV9D305MQq9EhGwv+ZZKrgOoqbZe9XYquNt1J8oMAg42muIDut GBMIppZIsxHhntBOSdYJsJyei8Fv8oFTmKYAY6kEJzgXuJkS4Af6UU6CGrBVabQIA3WA sI+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdVQu3Lr0K2EpFeOHWFLiS3R1g0/ivAtMLxYK2AuUXdeWaG2rTB zHudHfigrxe6Vr5XCEOLaznhYRn5FEZ+/0tOFAk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpo6J3ccp/MMuYgqo3iddiBAH1rD92x7OCGkxvdpA0SfyCBidv4dsxkuTtDi961qvWqnTPE9F2snhbJN5VfxlA=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:720a:: with SMTP id p10-v6mr4284297oic.180.1526587249333; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a9d:23:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAErg=HF9hMZwPsZUAK81WigdmGLTGaRK7bJ=BrjnHhjBWvYNLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwj=VTBHYxH-iOaqEUHxALpBfSXWG3p0+xxUnY+o4CmGvA@mail.gmail.com> <BN6PR14MB1106A2890EE8B9243B4EA08C83920@BN6PR14MB1106.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CAMm+LwhuBoQ1VHQy-=E2FODYq4Fnzs8e24Yqyfg4akwQTsqc=w@mail.gmail.com> <1e8468d7-da6c-62f1-e24b-1ee03df22606@cs.tcd.ie> <e678276f-79c2-ec3c-7df5-f70794740f77@nostrum.com> <AB332E06-E1F5-4E82-9EF8-B49846865DAC@vigilsec.com> <f623981f-a379-4a94-0fda-a765a8318841@nostrum.com> <CAMm+LwjFqv4JiRLTBAcZB+EvBC0nH53jgBaCfFfaGTa5QSbrZw@mail.gmail.com> <c6424d23-493c-8831-41c1-2ebcc808b7c9@nostrum.com> <CAErg=HF9hMZwPsZUAK81WigdmGLTGaRK7bJ=BrjnHhjBWvYNLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 16:00:48 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: trTdgjbEoJjRn3eeSp7lrJJUFZQ
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwibp=pdXsp8fCbJ6PR_a83mq-5yO9x9tL9ihkOOm6CzvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, SPASM <SPASM@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b71aa5056c6c4a7c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/pdYRUYRzqrvjheM9bWgHjsytiUY>
Subject: Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 20:00:53 -0000
I am not sure why this discussion would cause confusion as it is normal for people to discuss the broad outlines of a proposal before writing text. It is also common for people to discuss an emerging security issue in a closely related working group before deciding on what the appropriate venue to hold discussions in would be. Even more so in this case since the problem and solution spaces are strongly constrained and I suspect that there is a very wide range of agreement about what needs to be done and how to approach a solution. But if you will insist on Internet Drafts relevant to the subject matter, you will find my proposals on the topic here: http://mathmesh.com/Resources/ Since my design brief was to provide a proof of concept, I started from a clean state and ignored existing work. Now that we have established that transparent end-to-end security is possible we can look at what changes we would need to make to the existing mail infrastructure to apply that approach to legacy systems. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> wrote: > I'm having trouble understanding how the current discussion relates to the > LAMPS work. It sounds from Phil's initial message, is that this isn't > related to LAMPS. There's been suggestions that this might be the > CA/Browser Forum (despite the CA/Browser Forum not even having a proposed > charter to clean this up), that this might be a W3C/WHATWG issue (despite > the browsers explicitly rejecting some of these proposals), or perhaps > somewhere else. > > For my own understanding, is there a concrete proposal for either a > document or work LAMPS should take on? Otherwise, would it be better to > have this discussion elsewhere? > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: > >> On 5/17/18 10:46 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: >> >> I am composing this in Gmail right now. And there is my outlook client in >> the window underneath. The Web browser is not just a full fledged email >> client, it is the client of choice. >> >> >> I don't want to get too far down the rabbit hole of semantics here, but >> claiming that a browser is an email client because it can run Gmail is >> fully congruent with claiming your operating system is an email client >> because it can run Outlook. >> >> More to the point: you know what I meant. >> >> /a >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spasm mailing list >> Spasm@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm >> >> >
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Alexey Melnikov
- [lamps] S/MIME fix Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Jim Schaad
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Tim Hollebeek
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Stephen Farrell
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Adam Roach
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Tim Hollebeek
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Stephen Farrell
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Adam Roach
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Adam Roach
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Ryan Sleevi
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Ryan Sleevi
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [lamps] S/MIME fix Phillip Hallam-Baker