Re: [lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG document?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 28 November 2017 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126A5128B27 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:17:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ixkzubo6Iq1i for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA57127517 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EEF300581 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:17:03 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id JWcvZJl7y22X for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:16:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from new-host-8.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB7D0300431; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:16:58 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <84e6d5a2-4a51-8993-00ef-56be4e1c04be@eff.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:17:57 -0500
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <680EB976-D9D9-4BF8-A93D-C6146BE9DCB4@vigilsec.com>
References: <84e6d5a2-4a51-8993-00ef-56be4e1c04be@eff.org>
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/syOx1QA9sDfDFrb_58Tc0JoJC-8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG document?
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:17:09 -0000

Our Area Director needs to complete the recharter before the document can be formally adopted.

Russ


> On Nov 17, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> wrote:
> 
> At the WG session at IETF100 we took a hum on standardizing the CAA
> implementation that's current in production, i.e. the contents of
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification-02.txt.
> Currently that's published as an individual draft. What steps do we need
> to take to turn that into a WG document so we can make progress towards
> an RFC?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jacob