IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [EXTERNAL] Re: CAA processing for email addresses

Nicolas Lidzborski <nlidz+ietf@google.com> Mon, 05 December 2022 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <nlidz@google.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7A0C1522D2 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:10:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -22.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-22.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SL27pZ-sDYAc for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:10:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-x112c.google.com (mail-yw1-x112c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF80DC1522D0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:10:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-x112c.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-3bfd998fa53so134490367b3.5 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 15:10:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=eEJws012fwHqHv/dKqGjvP9IknFdqF8DDVDZUfHatUw=; b=S8Us9vsuEDiVuxhYW1XvgAq7qo9QrmFPFY16KVgtHW1AQY/KYENDBadpWlTr58HMuP Av4lSgWku8+5sCMNfYL786Rx5HC54hvgNHGop51XonEFaDB6TTBY9VPkZvNDQNLYMaC/ zqvrgk0aDGhu2LIWnnCFGIjlcykAJlFOCkqtlQClbQqx8CWFdwI8O+gN5VOE/qeBKxNU ZWgmFxvbMmNcXCxsXW4oWBmDPVGx7Uqa3kMlI0JkJZDG5EwopXvEqEblUYtMlarY3yRA 73GfZwjuo1zm1Acevng3AKNjvCZ7MRYIrtae3/IZ0kntHGlyBFS4nQfthZ/j5JF0vjWu dCfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=eEJws012fwHqHv/dKqGjvP9IknFdqF8DDVDZUfHatUw=; b=Sw8BN0HICvsu1gsu9PqZJ8+NLv3awyBInJhXEJUg9LN63po79YBA6aNM8HnV5TXoEI jRikpXqSFnc1hbtiYKklzeH2GT/ZU91psT99cnWESSH/vAVbAHjwg7YgDjetqK3xlCd4 izQf/Zn/qTXqAj4mKgfqTOUcoSxt6gWKKYP+gakGmcTtnSzSu7CBCId9qXS4ukC2u9rP SBOFRyyu/7j9CqT3RuTKs0Z0QlcMOgoxcC6VjegQ/QGxHay3v6KgWeDdXsMPrYJTYksw FRJpjCQKXattrlJ+sH9la3Khu7INaBfvrzBhaaOMOeRP0/JLwHJfcYFPJpU8cY2SYqXo fTDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkX6w+gkkoc3xJodKoyilbegl5jIW4bK6qGUPAXr2l3e23jePgB iMvMCObYx3g4+gUX2M3tgErlupuyOzOrW79AU7+ez6leqcXiGNME
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7KtwbgT2tifOvjNX6dTzMTdwfFZXYw/18dTTYk+pXf/ZArpnyDd9ZVkNzblrhvUKnxJSy6LMWU9JSBbrsXg+8=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:7c86:0:b0:3b3:dcf6:50bb with SMTP id x128-20020a817c86000000b003b3dcf650bbmr52739655ywc.496.1670281848209; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 15:10:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR14MB2186A5E0A82D87085564B90D92159@DM6PR14MB2186.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <5d2804c9-cd04-14e8-9fad-91254212e04d@gmail.com> <DM6PR14MB2186880BB993689D6CE890F292159@DM6PR14MB2186.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <3c5ce299-8647-c481-57d8-ca604a655e0c@cs.tcd.ie> <daba6e40-227e-6229-173d-c9085902af91@cs.tcd.ie> <CH0PR11MB5739CDF4AC9F496DA341DA249F159@CH0PR11MB5739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <87bfb6bc-24d0-fafc-d0b9-546640bda7c3@cs.tcd.ie> <CH0PR11MB57394997AEBA7EF1FA81C4D69F149@CH0PR11MB5739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <DM6PR14MB2186AC61073AA34BC230CE2B92149@DM6PR14MB2186.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CH0PR11MB5739C121E1D96CE28382B4D49F149@CH0PR11MB5739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMm+LwiXQzN4O=efFg6e7U1C2oW7YFPbx51ZjLhMDL5Z0s87rg@mail.gmail.com> <876b96f2-4a51-df07-a31a-4fe6caafcb73@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <876b96f2-4a51-df07-a31a-4fe6caafcb73@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Nicolas Lidzborski <nlidz+ietf@google.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 15:10:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAYYu_t0xJSNhwy8Cd7ZyjcZznZy+qfhBLz=d4_WDd-oowqXhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Mike Ounsworth <Mike.Ounsworth=40entrust.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Corey Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell=40digicert.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Corey Bonnell <Corey.Bonnell@digicert.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003d385c05ef1ccc1d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/vf3gglYgTEPBXRHKA3CCm6ZJQpw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [EXTERNAL] Re: CAA processing for email addresses
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 23:10:52 -0000

Speaking on behalf of Gmail. We do offer S/MIME support today in Gmail (
https://support.google.com/a/answer/6374496?hl=en for example).
We have customers who use that S/MIME feature with custom domains that
would like to be able to restrict to specific CAs. We are therefore
supportive of this work.

Nico

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 12:03 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
>
> On 01/12/2022 18:46, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> > I support adoption of this draft.
>
> In the absence of mail service operators who say they want
> this, I'm against adoption. (If this does originate in CAB
> forum, I'm not aware folks like that are represented there.)
>
> If some mail service operators wanted this, I'd consider what
> they said.
>
> S.
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email