Re: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06

"Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <bashandy@cisco.com> Wed, 01 February 2017 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bashandy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3E3129E56; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:49:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O6CWYeDIM1dk; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:49:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5201294B9; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:49:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1279; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1485964167; x=1487173767; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KlJrX9rW+HEgUSbnNrLkJdS99JKqXfJZvggEINs9Zrg=; b=EVKZ0t8EscaP9JRvbpbKNkhJF/ju30nSL5ONmJgXK6GjIVeivWh+lGBD wx6/yRWagGFoxPU9zNh2AlzHMJoRZqktrD9YYvQD/oFDHIb7HPi7Yw4bp 3nIWpkN0Ckt8P5KDRnanshCGXyuWsa503SRK6B0HIHl5dvyDwNzbms8jJ k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,320,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="206906525"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2017 15:49:26 +0000
Received: from [10.65.84.236] ([10.65.84.236]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v11FnMH7017932; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:49:24 GMT
Message-ID: <5892037D.3000609@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 07:49:17 -0800
From: "Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <bashandy@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Horneffer <maho@nic.dtag.de>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, spring@ietf.org
References: <e9839b0c-6ce4-48f0-c44d-9524c78b6c74@nokia.com> <be165a54-dbad-dc9e-d3bc-05d9b41fb946@nic.dtag.de>
In-Reply-To: <be165a54-dbad-dc9e-d3bc-05d9b41fb946@nic.dtag.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/59qzpTj7kkpzyg_zOmopiaY27Fs>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 15:49:29 -0000

Hi

Also  support as a co-author

Ahmed

On 1/30/2017 12:58 AM, Martin Horneffer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> support from me as co-author and operator.
>
> Bets regards, Martin
>
>
> Am 27.01.17 um 12:05 schrieb Martin Vigoureux:
>>
>> Hello Working Group,
>>
>> This email starts a 2-week Working Group Last Call on 
>> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06 [1].
>>
>> ¤ Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent
>> version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than the
>> *12th of February*.
>> Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it 
>> is also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a 
>> Proposed Standard RFC.
>>
>> ¤ We have already polled for IPR knowledge on this document and all 
>> Authors have replied.
>> IPR exists against this document and has been disclosed [2].
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> M&B
>>
>> ---
>> [1] 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/
>> [2] 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spring mailing list
>> spring@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>>
>