IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 30 January 2017 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E10129442 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:09:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ef8_MRq-KMSn for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:09:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD8A1293F4 for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c85so207198332wmi.1 for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:09:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xfvo9uOkku46RL2nTr5eYNoSyLYzkHjN6ZZ+K5lZJZY=; b=YKvHVPnU0lePXZGv3moXvXi4OML5LcpjwWwKaYvHtyBMjGNpecuZaNvJZgKOYE3Z+c MYXXr2litDGT7gnRbvVqjkTBo3yHdSgdjrRdZdy56rLehQZ9J67L57VZOaDt5GlesHsQ USDxd+LQ4RQvGrWig8GUz0vCHfRZyIfDwP3jxaZgnwcwv4qir7aYiX1t8x1r97skGmK3 /Ph43pmvylUv3tIFSxJQkpqfAH5JQpGfCCTgLRx7g7ildCZ0z8WSsSlRUsq9M0+1XJSq +ma+EcT4QJl36Rn55055aG/zK9Y2Ve4tz4vU58beioYHZkSlXCxk9jiDPgqpKRf81uTn K2Lw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xfvo9uOkku46RL2nTr5eYNoSyLYzkHjN6ZZ+K5lZJZY=; b=XJbLGfMHHoe9nq8J0alSWcISBCS7+ISKIcRRnACGcqs/4o0yps2vOsdU4kalzasfIL xOmytP+l1MN2jFHqZ/UmPGuaqKXsMm0pTttFrcXYRRG28MD1x9Z+z67Y/SGFoA4+JubK pnL12Bk5hR7f6RSynsqNotLlT4v3Ml979oFLBcLL0iSA/+q3ZUkxshspXVPy/PhWvbRt Bt8GloLvm5t+Dl1kYRsefTOMepCcYBwdltFu/qAtEJf60/riwaqOo+uq7YGJ4nJU5J9/ 6Cj9TuFbssKMBKEt5yO0gR98rtUVN4ruoq1/sF2SpMLiNKl3g52skgMEADeFglJd8+dv Gc3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL3GAbnfN69mrQlm4p/d5Rx1jqFzLGDQjYxiaOlghk6LbRg3W6SfOOA1t4qOOe/gg==
X-Received: by 10.28.230.91 with SMTP id d88mr12597018wmh.129.1485770963682; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm9981004wmi.23.2017.01.30.02.09.22 for <spring@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:09:23 -0800 (PST)
To: spring@ietf.org
References: <e9839b0c-6ce4-48f0-c44d-9524c78b6c74@nokia.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F57268540187F20F@SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4c587b8e-0672-6382-237a-aecd5ba2d69c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:09:20 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25B4902B1192E84696414485F57268540187F20F@SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/D_-P3EKzfbY9tZBqW5C0Vu3O7zo>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:09:28 -0000

I agree.

Whilst, as indicated later in the thread, some of the cases studied so 
far may only need a single label, this is a powerful general purpose 
technology that  will be used for many purposes that have not yet been 
considered. Some discussion of the implication of the label stack limit 
imposed by current h/w and the need to consider this in future designs 
would be useful.

Stewart


On 27/01/2017 19:59, Uma Chunduri wrote:
> Support.
>
> One quick comment:
>
> While section 3 correctly documents MPLS instantiation of SR -  given the constructs SR has (ADJ SID for example) it's good to document SID/Label depth implications in the deployments.
>
> --
> Uma C.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 3:05 AM
> To: spring@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls@ietf.org
> Subject: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06
>
> Hello Working Group,
>
> This email starts a 2-week Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06 [1].
>
> ¤ Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than the *12th of February*.
> Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a Proposed Standard RFC.
>
> ¤ We have already polled for IPR knowledge on this document and all Authors have replied.
> IPR exists against this document and has been disclosed [2].
>
> Thank you
>
> M&B
>
> ---
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/
> [2]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email