IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06

Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com> Fri, 27 January 2017 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8F3129869; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:59:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I3nlyzyxKJfE; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:59:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9EE129862; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:59:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DFI77241; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:59:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:59:29 +0000
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.69]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.133]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:59:23 -0800
From: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06
Thread-Index: AQHSeI1JuVelHzKrr0ygIt4K/eUNVKFMs62w
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:59:23 +0000
Message-ID: <25B4902B1192E84696414485F57268540187F20F@SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <e9839b0c-6ce4-48f0-c44d-9524c78b6c74@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <e9839b0c-6ce4-48f0-c44d-9524c78b6c74@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.213.49.99]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.588BA6A2.022D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.69, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: adb6e5fb30f71d29334efcc8b77fb9fe
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/qS7-Om5fYa88M34PGfxfg2hCfdo>
Cc: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:59:35 -0000

Support.

One quick comment: 

While section 3 correctly documents MPLS instantiation of SR -  given the constructs SR has (ADJ SID for example) it's good to document SID/Label depth implications in the deployments.

--
Uma C.

-----Original Message-----
From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 3:05 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06

Hello Working Group,

This email starts a 2-week Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-06 [1].

¤ Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than the *12th of February*.
Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a Proposed Standard RFC.

¤ We have already polled for IPR knowledge on this document and all Authors have replied.
IPR exists against this document and has been disclosed [2].

Thank you

M&B

---
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/
[2]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email