IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 30 December 2019 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F50B12003E for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:40:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LJCJfni5V3VB for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:40:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E8F0120013 for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:40:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id g1so22718038qtr.13 for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:40:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yfW19Di11yXlHGF2dtTnEva2owLsoTQdMD007tN408o=; b=CknJEmTb2pdha7tCCz2+Dl40Wa1TWs7QYIOpw/lkyW8WLWkUu/O+LeNYBmv49vzm4w /CIkdBjOoMTmsInwM81YrRHN37JHkmknD3bQWlhljqgjmzetbi2ARdCqB7sRX+/C7toQ ITC1LFSrjXJhMmLhpBOj/L63K4U+LF8I50Ao6tO2eNMuPjyHY8h1hBJ7i7K295o8HcKF Wib9CpnH/PUd0w02bkx6PIggEbaUvJIFJPkHcxdGYPeYCbiOPZtn+kZJSGa4CNFQimWg 6PasNIIzLxkUJJLxpz0qNZnlYpynWoqS8X/wrmVgO+SksIDrmB5tw4LfFmZRqnXl5Nax EKjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yfW19Di11yXlHGF2dtTnEva2owLsoTQdMD007tN408o=; b=X636RQ0TWI/KhktxR0JlJm1UZ9tbWkacEAxjbe5pxoljDIjGFhj7HvF4T+cM4XSiNB n+E0RxeXuX5crAd0WUDcjIFwiz4k7KiLPa8U4eGmyI+QNkjRScpNj6OxKS6cMU2stv6A 1vDmo+1YvbVdCuUfqJYsYLsGy7s/CDfGDr5h54znH/kp/rDwHiqrl2kY09iFUC1raOlS +CC7aYBYm1Y1DbtN4wq/fxDAvU4xAXqMOM2x/AeY8+AibtXDf0lhyXqYSw0izjEW8AOF Hp5MP2yGEYhDHj4K9vR5O+7AH9biBWo7fBbCqKQoYh0eGfZFQ1ULoa6F9HzC1yB7YKYZ X91A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVwKRJdelIhS06GZyAl4M681VcnUE7Nc88tRKGroTerj2y193e8 fC9Fmx4FrSjz0GTZZ/N5ivyJZYligHkTKqRoZHLJlw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyiJOGWRWX/7e4WatK8NTtfnTy0RqqXponMHO6Wqs7p6HvxZEiAOjiN9PvcqOp9fncdDDAHHsT1yHiXUHFgvZ8=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3703:: with SMTP id o3mr48207014qtb.208.1577713243517; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:40:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN7PR05MB393899B40E06055BCEE73B13AE270@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMFes1Sz0rzMY61maoQhH-soc_6f_Ni7D78dDimxuDjwEQ@mail.gmail.com> <BN7PR05MB393849548B10852E021EB9D2AE270@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB393849548B10852E021EB9D2AE270@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:40:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEikwu581tBkXjx0nXb_asfrmLYSrbVgCyduq+oXMXS=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000700331059aebfdab"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/5hiHiIkBu882-uHOBrtHIes8Hf4>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 13:40:46 -0000

Ron,

I beg your pardon, but what are you trying to say?

Isn't this a WG document now and *any* WG member is fully entitled to
comment on any question asked or point being raised ? Leave alone formal
document contributor.

Are you saying that answers from those listed on top of the draft carries
more weight ? Is this some new IETF process you are trying to define here ?

Once document transitions to WG doc status authors who own src are
becoming just editors with the obligation to incorporate WG suggested
changes which got approved via rough consensus as judged by chairs. Are you
questioning that too ?

Thx,
R.

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 1:19 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:

> Robert,
>
>
>
> We should probably let the authors decide if that is part of the answer to
> my question.
>
>
>
>
> Ron
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email