[spring] SR replication segment for P2MP MDT

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 21 March 2020 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CA13A1065 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lbrUL5Haxw0P for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551693A1091 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id l14so7625139ilj.8 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rWxBukO3sv9O4jNloO10cMT9qexYg8+r66OVAy4CL94=; b=vX5ixDSKWwMAfwQjEXF00SOyBvATIir3Rmb3kIJqZm4wclmJucfr2VGxrR95+5UYYW DTGNY+wbqBAqevzixUzlxbWBLfPKVp56UCSftCV/Q9jW8ggoOBZ6+/6C3edXH4yQ9Hzl KB/8i3x3H7LHeGxgGSjjhf5djN/Gp9GhaVHuZhpTkG45V7QSjMUaBXRjjjY7hlGlxniF 63hRSEPra8+vBFoi+8ftLVdOWuOiqFuYFSsmlo+gE/l6uEeX0ZG053W6luhjzRWX0JL7 K8JcO+wWwJB8HJvukEK8MEz6NC3OXClw3JY6CGxhDEaU+h2oa+vqHLY9x7w4LQAOzOPc ayDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rWxBukO3sv9O4jNloO10cMT9qexYg8+r66OVAy4CL94=; b=rXpO39UkHb34ef2eIwlDZHZV28Hx/vwQdwTMA0TMJCPmnxuHZJkYlKrZZB0AggAf+s cFFjFnaLMVx2dHADKYzpGSPq5IszsvZAmfJtb3pBJ+DfRQfqr7uNiNaRdTbajfv7HW/l RKDeqNHusM/6uQp44hz3SIIJRZ8N7YyioXUyYPnINJUGuYYSO8kDBan6mGLxH6XhzRUT 01EBteTRo8OjcFEcZONKzhi/904+k83+8D+A0ijn7nd0b+KeMqfT0SqGqC9lf53FLkIj Og+9Id6jtkBIQ56JDIRWdzuGoGNfSVh07yrXUPd77Fph5aCCX3C+ZAJkkfgzyT0JWXSs XWfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0Q+EwbYVKccc/FBSgWxTslXfddt8dHdcKaiax7sglpQ6idRfTo Vf/XjZOQLkk0MpnaEOStDYhMsV9Sr6iXz1hGdSLaNilR
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuBurU5zQqYbZBcBS24zYh5aUvC2R1Jfu943AwEOOCs/KrwQ0IQYZqmVef4rSCovSkfBDAfy9UjYC6HbQBbBwg=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:96c6:: with SMTP id g189mr10918597ilh.276.1584754842266; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:40:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV1rMiM61yhfA-i=+VcdZVGiqW31nj6qL_1NYxOdgatXAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, "Voyer, Daniel" <daniel.voyer@bell.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006def8105a1537d80"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/aeADYmcOjuG5y4z5fnieQtyQYOQ>
Subject: [spring] SR replication segment for P2MP MDT
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 01:40:50 -0000

Daniel & Authors

I had a question related to the draft related to lab POC testing.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment/

In the draft it states that SR replication using Tree SID to replication to
leafs on a tree is only supported with a centralized PCE controller based
model using BGP LS.

I have an SR-MPLS Cisco VIRL POC test bed using XRV9000 nodes 7.0.1 using
ISIS SR extensions where I have L3 vpn overlay and everything is working
very well from a unicast perspective.  No issues.

I have LDP still enabled but via “SR-Prefer” am using SR-MPLS forwarding
plane.  I kept LDP enabled so I can use mLDP for LMDT label switched trees
for multicast and technically that all MVPN procedures RFC 6513 6514 encap
tunnel types should work for p-tree using mLDP forwarding plane for
multicast while SR-MPLS is being used for unicast.

I can get the LMDT core tree default and data mdt to build for MP2MP or
P2MP tree but cannot get on the FEC root the MRIB state to build.  Not sure
why?

Any ideas.  Is there anything special I have to do for multicast to use the
ldp mLDP extension data plane and not the SR-MPLS data plane.

I think what’s happening is at the data plane forwarding level SR-MPLS data
plane is being used instead of mLDP.

I have a bunch of SR-TE policies in place with candidate dynamic and static
ERO paths and that works well coloring the VRF steering.

I was wondering if I can use SR-TE binding Sid with Static ERO loose path
using prefix SID of egress PE to replicate to and build P2MP tree
instantiation via SR-TE.

Is that possible?

Kind regards

Gyan


-- 

Gyan  Mishra

Network Engineering & Technology

Verizon

Silver Spring, MD 20904

Phone: 301 502-1347

Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com