Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management

Frode Kileng <frodek@tele.no> Thu, 21 July 2016 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <frodek@tele.no>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D8F12D590 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSoVEBvdgicQ for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gorgon.tele.no (gorgon.tele.no [193.156.17.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02A312D53B for <spud@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[IPv6:::1]) by gorgon.tele.no with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <frodek@tele.no>) id 1bQECv-0006nY-4d for spud@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:40:09 +0200
To: spud@ietf.org
References: <43a39476-9327-87ef-204c-d7c614a80669@tele.no> <CALx6S34edZbOpfeQr0Z5P90AydtFubxvcMBQpDq8r+9-1o1AYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Frode Kileng <frodek@tele.no>
Message-ID: <0643740d-32c0-7b4f-6ff5-3a4320db90fe@tele.no>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:36:42 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34edZbOpfeQr0Z5P90AydtFubxvcMBQpDq8r+9-1o1AYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/bHUNfWlZWor-19BnIjwuN92e_Pk>
Subject: Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:38:53 -0000

On 21.07.2016 15:28, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> That said, PLUS may be an enabler for mobile network management practices,
>> for example a 1-bit latency/throughput prioritization indicator.
>>
> Doesn't DSCP/TOS already provide that?

Oh, I didn't intend to say this is a good idea, just one potential usage 
of PLUS as it has been identified. I do think there's need to do a lot 
of work to understand the pro/cons and how it should be implemented.

frodek