[Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Sat, 17 July 2021 02:07 UTC

From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-chairs@ietf.org, srcomp@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 10:07:33 +0800
Message-ID: <03c001d77ab0$81ec2a90$85c47fb0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03C1_01D77AF3.900F6A90"
Thread-Index: Add6sIFVh/o7ZErwT02Qgg4tFSsk0A==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/Ku68PBDSi_-W4UFdAMHKPUT92-M>
Subject: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team
Precedence: list

Dear all,

After a year of hard working, the SRCOMP design team almost completed the
expected tasks, and here we would like to make a brief summary.

 

The goal of the design team

The design team's goal is to produce (rough) consensus (of the DT) outputs
to the WG on two related topics [1]:

1) What are the requirements for solutions to compressed segment routing
information for use over IPv6;

2) An analysis of proposed approaches to compressing         segment routing
information for use over IPv6.

 

What we have achieved:

The DT members have exchanged over 1000 emails in the mailing list since the
first email sent in SRCOMP mailing list at July 17th, 2020 [2]. After nearly
100 meetings (once or twice meeting per week at the past year), the DT
members finally generated the required two documents as planned. The first
revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement[3] was submitted
at Oct 30th,  2020, and the first revision of
draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis [4] was submitted at Feb 19th,
2021.

 

After several updates, the complete and stable revision of the
requirements[3] and analysis drafts[4] had been updated at July 8th , 2021. 

 

We believe the content of these two drafts can be a good input to the SPRING
WG. Many thanks for the patience from anybody. 

 

Acknowledgements:

We would like to thank all the members of the design team:

Ron Bonica(Juniper), Weiqiang Cheng(China Mobile), Darren Dukes(Cisco), Wim
Henderickx(Nokia),Cheng Li(Huawei), Shaofu Peng(ZTE),Sander Steffann(SJM
Steffann), and Chongfeng Xie(China Telecom) (in alphabetical order) 

 

Next Step:

Looking forward to the comments for the requirements draft[3] and analysis
draft[4].

 

 

[1].
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c
98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRkrt
we6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7mddigOV$>
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/

[2].
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/
__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRkrtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7lG
PpV6y$> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/

[3].
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-
spring-compression-requirement__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6x
pRkrtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7j8Fjyrm$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requireme
nt

[4].
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-
spring-compression-analysis__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRk
rtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7tpAwlvQ$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

 

 

 

Best regards,

Weiqiang Cheng on behalf of SRCOMP design team

[Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team Weiqiang Cheng