[Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review
Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Thu, 15 July 2021 13:26 UTC
Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE2D3A1234 for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ac2MKMPEu7wT for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 06:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2C13A122D for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 06:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.7]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea60f0377ecf4-02035; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:26:23 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea60f0377ecf4-02035
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.2.55.93]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee460f0377d4d1-41f5c; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:26:23 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee460f0377d4d1-41f5c
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: srcomp@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:26:39 +0800
Message-ID: <02ca01d7797d$0b496030$21dc2090$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02CB_01D779C0.196CA030"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Add5fQr4a4EZzHghRI+XMLSlSQq1Bw==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/TIZ51NV1B3wWdrQFdCW3rtLb6WQ>
Subject: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Compressed SRv6 SID Design Team <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:26:57 -0000
Hi team, As action 3 in last meeting, I prepared some text to summarize the work of DT as follows. Let me know your comments. ======= Dear all, After a year of hard working, the SRCOMP design team almost completed the expected tasks, and here we would like to make a brief summary. The goal of the design team The design team is to produce (rough) consensus (of the DT) outputs to the WG on two related topics [1]: 1) What are the requirements for solutions to compressing segment routing information for use over IPv6; 2) An analysis of proposed approaches to compressing segment routing information for use over IPv6. What we have achieved: The DT numbers have exchanged over 1000 emails in the mailing list since the first email sent in SRCOMP mailing list at July 17th, 2020 [2]. After nearly 100 meetings (once or twice meeting per week at the past year), the DT members finally generated the required two documents as planned. The first revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement[3] was submitted at Oct 30th, 2020, and the first revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis [4] was submitted at Feb 19th, 2021. After several updates, the complete and stable revision of the requirements[3] and analysis drafts[4] had been updated at July 8th , 2021. We believe the content of these two drafts can be a good input to the SPRING WG. Many thanks for the patience from anybody. Acknowledgements: We would like to thank all the members of the design team: Ron Bonica(Juniper), Weiqiang Cheng(China Mobile), Darren Dukes(Cisco), Wim Henderickx(Nokia),Cheng Li(Huawei), Shaofu Peng(ZTE),Sander Steffann(SJM Steffann), and Chongfeng Xie(China Telecom) (in alphabetical order) Next Step: Looking forward to the comments for the requirements draft[3] and analysis draft[4]. Best regards, Weiqiang Cheng on behalf of SRCOMP design team [1]. <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/ [2]. <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/ [3]. <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirem ent> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requireme nt [4]. <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis
- [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for rev… Weiqiang Cheng
- Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for… Weiqiang Cheng
- Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for… Ron Bonica
- Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for… Weiqiang Cheng
- Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for… Weiqiang Cheng