[Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Thu, 15 July 2021 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE2D3A1234 for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ac2MKMPEu7wT for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 06:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2C13A122D for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 06:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.7]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea60f0377ecf4-02035; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:26:23 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea60f0377ecf4-02035
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.2.55.93]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee460f0377d4d1-41f5c; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:26:23 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee460f0377d4d1-41f5c
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: srcomp@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:26:39 +0800
Message-ID: <02ca01d7797d$0b496030$21dc2090$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02CB_01D779C0.196CA030"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Add5fQr4a4EZzHghRI+XMLSlSQq1Bw==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/TIZ51NV1B3wWdrQFdCW3rtLb6WQ>
Subject: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Compressed SRv6 SID Design Team <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:26:57 -0000

Hi team,

As action 3 in last meeting, I prepared some text to summarize the work of
DT as follows.

Let me know your comments.

 

 

=======

Dear all,

After a year of hard working, the SRCOMP design team almost completed the
expected tasks, and here we would like to make a brief summary.

 

The goal of the design team

The design team is to produce (rough) consensus (of the DT) outputs to the
WG on two related topics [1]:

1) What are the requirements for solutions to compressing segment routing
information for use over IPv6;

2) An analysis of proposed approaches to compressing         segment routing
information for use over IPv6.

 

What we have achieved:

The DT numbers have exchanged over 1000 emails in the mailing list since the
first email sent in SRCOMP mailing list at July 17th, 2020 [2]. After nearly
100 meetings (once or twice meeting per week at the past year), the DT
members finally generated the required two documents as planned. The first
revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement[3] was submitted
at Oct 30th,  2020, and the first revision of
draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis [4] was submitted at Feb 19th,
2021.

After several updates, the complete and stable revision of the
requirements[3] and analysis drafts[4] had been updated at July 8th , 2021. 

 

We believe the content of these two drafts can be a good input to the SPRING
WG. Many thanks for the patience from anybody. 

 

Acknowledgements:

We would like to thank all the members of the design team:

Ron Bonica(Juniper), Weiqiang Cheng(China Mobile), Darren Dukes(Cisco), Wim
Henderickx(Nokia),Cheng Li(Huawei), Shaofu Peng(ZTE),Sander Steffann(SJM
Steffann), and Chongfeng Xie(China Telecom) (in alphabetical order) 

 

Next Step:

Looking forward to the comments for the requirements draft[3] and analysis
draft[4].

 

Best regards,

Weiqiang Cheng on behalf of SRCOMP design team

 

[1].
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/>
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/

[2].  <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/

[3].
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirem
ent>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requireme
nt

[4].
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis
>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis