Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

[Weiqiang Cheng <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Ron.

I will prepare some slides for the presentation and discussion, and I will
send it to SRCOMP for review next week.

Hope we can have some progress on compression topic.

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

 

发件人: Srcomp [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Ron Bonica
发送时间: 2021年7月16日 11:33
收件人: Weiqiang Cheng; [e-mail]
主题: Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

 

Weiqiang,

 

Looks good to me. I see that we have 30 minutes on the spring agenda.

 

                                            Ron

 

 

 

Juniper Business Use Only

From: Srcomp <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Weiqiang Cheng
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 9:27 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

 

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

 

Hi team,

As action 3 in last meeting, I prepared some text to summarize the work of
DT as follows.

Let me know your comments.

 

 

=======

Dear all,

After a year of hard working, the SRCOMP design team almost completed the
expected tasks, and here we would like to make a brief summary.

 

The goal of the design team

The design team is to produce (rough) consensus (of the DT) outputs to the
WG on two related topics [1]:

1) What are the requirements for solutions to compressing segment routing
information for use over IPv6;

2) An analysis of proposed approaches to compressing         segment routing
information for use over IPv6.

 

What we have achieved:

The DT numbers have exchanged over 1000 emails in the mailing list since the
first email sent in SRCOMP mailing list at July 17th, 2020 [2]. After nearly
100 meetings (once or twice meeting per week at the past year), the DT
members finally generated the required two documents as planned. The first
revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement[3] was submitted
at Oct 30th,  2020, and the first revision of
draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis [4] was submitted at Feb 19th,
2021.

 

After several updates, the complete and stable revision of the
requirements[3] and analysis drafts[4] had been updated at July 8th , 2021. 

 

We believe the content of these two drafts can be a good input to the SPRING
WG. Many thanks for the patience from anybody. 

 

Acknowledgements:

We would like to thank all the members of the design team:

Ron Bonica(Juniper), Weiqiang Cheng(China Mobile), Darren Dukes(Cisco), Wim
Henderickx(Nokia),Cheng Li(Huawei), Shaofu Peng(ZTE),Sander Steffann(SJM
Steffann), and Chongfeng Xie(China Telecom) (in alphabetical order) 

 

Next Step:

Looking forward to the comments for the requirements draft[3] and analysis
draft[4].

 

Best regards,

Weiqiang Cheng on behalf of SRCOMP design team

 

[1].
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c
98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRkrt
we6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7mddigOV$>
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/

[2].
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/
__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRkrtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7lG
PpV6y$> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/

[3].
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-
spring-compression-requirement__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6x
pRkrtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7j8Fjyrm$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requireme
nt

[4].
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-
spring-compression-analysis__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRk
rtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7tpAwlvQ$>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis