Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Fri, 16 July 2021 02:13 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332083A1FE2 for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y7O8bhKZjYQb for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9282D3A1FE1 for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GQvXk1kZZz6D8Yp for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:58:30 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm100007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.116) by fraeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:12:55 +0200
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.56) by dggpemm100007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:12:54 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) by dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:12:54 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>, "srcomp@ietf.org" <srcomp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review
Thread-Index: Add5fQr4a4EZzHghRI+XMLSlSQq1BwAaclAA
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:12:53 +0000
Message-ID: <68e50846844b4d9d852f78c068bff238@huawei.com>
References: <02ca01d7797d$0b496030$21dc2090$@com>
In-Reply-To: <02ca01d7797d$0b496030$21dc2090$@com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.130]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_68e50846844b4d9d852f78c068bff238huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/P9xvBfpKCdHpPGbZwyF0SKsMse0>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Compressed SRv6 SID Design Team <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:13:14 -0000

Hi Weiqiang,

Agree with the text, many thanks for your work!

I make some editorial modifications. Please see below.

Respect,
Cheng



From: Srcomp [mailto:srcomp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Weiqiang Cheng
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 9:27 PM
To: srcomp@ietf.org
Subject: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

Hi team,
As action 3 in last meeting, I prepared some text to summarize the work of DT as follows.
Let me know your comments.


=======
Dear all,
After a year of hard working, the SRCOMP design team almost completed the expected tasks, and here we would like to make a brief summary.

The goal of the design team
The design team('s goal) is to produce (rough) consensus (of the DT) outputs to the WG on(about?) two related topics [1]:
1) What are the requirements for solutions to compressing(compress?) segment routing information for use over IPv6;
2) An analysis of proposed approaches to compressing segment routing information for use over IPv6.

What we have achieved:
The DT numbers have exchanged over 1000 emails in the mailing list since the first email sent in SRCOMP mailing list at July 17th, 2020 [2]. After nearly 100 meetings (once or twice meeting per week at the past year), the DT members finally generated the required two documents as planned. The first revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement[3] was submitted at Oct 30th,  2020, and the first revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis [4] was submitted at Feb 19th, 2021.

After several updates, the complete and stable revision of the requirements[3] and analysis drafts[4] had been updated at July 8th , 2021.

We believe the content of these two drafts can be a good input to the SPRING WG. Many thanks for the patience from anybody.

Acknowledgements:
We would like to thank all the members of the design team:
Ron Bonica(Juniper), Weiqiang Cheng(China Mobile), Darren Dukes(Cisco), Wim Henderickx(Nokia),Cheng Li(Huawei), Shaofu Peng(ZTE),Sander Steffann(SJM Steffann), and Chongfeng Xie(China Telecom) (in alphabetical order)

Next Step:
Looking forward to the comments for the requirements draft[3] and analysis draft[4].

Best regards,
Weiqiang Cheng on behalf of SRCOMP design team

[1]. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/
[2]. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/
[3]. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement
[4]. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis