Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

[Ron Bonica <[e-mail]>]

Weiqiang,

Looks good to me. I see that we have 30 minutes on the spring agenda.

                                            Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: Srcomp <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Weiqiang Cheng
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 9:27 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hi team,
As action 3 in last meeting, I prepared some text to summarize the work of DT as follows.
Let me know your comments.


=======
Dear all,
After a year of hard working, the SRCOMP design team almost completed the expected tasks, and here we would like to make a brief summary.

The goal of the design team
The design team is to produce (rough) consensus (of the DT) outputs to the WG on two related topics [1]:
1) What are the requirements for solutions to compressing segment routing information for use over IPv6;
2) An analysis of proposed approaches to compressing         segment routing information for use over IPv6.

What we have achieved:
The DT numbers have exchanged over 1000 emails in the mailing list since the first email sent in SRCOMP mailing list at July 17th, 2020 [2]. After nearly 100 meetings (once or twice meeting per week at the past year), the DT members finally generated the required two documents as planned. The first revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement[3] was submitted at Oct 30th,  2020, and the first revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis [4] was submitted at Feb 19th, 2021.

After several updates, the complete and stable revision of the requirements[3] and analysis drafts[4] had been updated at July 8th , 2021.

We believe the content of these two drafts can be a good input to the SPRING WG. Many thanks for the patience from anybody.

Acknowledgements:
We would like to thank all the members of the design team:
Ron Bonica(Juniper), Weiqiang Cheng(China Mobile), Darren Dukes(Cisco), Wim Henderickx(Nokia),Cheng Li(Huawei), Shaofu Peng(ZTE),Sander Steffann(SJM Steffann), and Chongfeng Xie(China Telecom) (in alphabetical order)

Next Step:
Looking forward to the comments for the requirements draft[3] and analysis draft[4].

Best regards,
Weiqiang Cheng on behalf of SRCOMP design team

[1]. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRkrtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7mddigOV$>
[2]. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRkrtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7lGPpV6y$>
[3]. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRkrtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7j8Fjyrm$>
[4]. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SfCb0RFxXj2ZhKjlnZuFLcISvmu6xpRkrtwe6QKtF2Ilb3HkssWQkssu7tpAwlvQ$>