Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Sat, 17 July 2021 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB4F3A15DC for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ww81olf6kwej for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A45B3A15EB for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.7]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app08-12008 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee860f23a3631e-147f5; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 10:02:32 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee860f23a3631e-147f5
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.1.6.6]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee460f23a36b36-add13; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 10:02:32 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee460f23a36b36-add13
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
Cc: srcomp@ietf.org
References: <02ca01d7797d$0b496030$21dc2090$@com> <87D21083-0466-4989-A516-55F762B7DE18@chinatelecom.cn>
In-Reply-To: <87D21083-0466-4989-A516-55F762B7DE18@chinatelecom.cn>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 10:02:47 +0800
Message-ID: <03b101d77aaf$d76317a0$862946e0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03B2_01D77AF2.E58657A0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Add6UMfffhdr9Q2PRyG5g4GEz6oDjQAXwDVA
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/4ty1lOEDyygnuHOP4iuoICnLlUs>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Compressed SRv6 SID Design Team <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 02:03:11 -0000

Thanks, Chongfeng.

I will sent it soon.

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

 

发件人: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn [mailto:xiechf@chinatelecom.cn] 
发送时间: 2021年7月16日 22:35
收件人: Weiqiang Cheng
抄送: srcomp@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Srcomp] Summay of the SRCOMP design team-for review

 

Hi,Weiqiang,

I agree with the text you prepared. Thanks!

 

Chongfeng

2021年7月15日 下午9:26,Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> 写道:

 

Hi team,

As action 3 in last meeting, I prepared some text to summarize the work of DT as follows.

Let me know your comments.

 

 

=======

Dear all,

After a year of hard working, the SRCOMP design team almost completed the expected tasks, and here we would like to make a brief summary.

 

The goal of the design team

The design team is to produce (rough) consensus (of the DT) outputs to the WG on two related topics [1]:

1) What are the requirements for solutions to compressing segment routing information for use over IPv6;

2) An analysis of proposed approaches to compressing         segment routing information for use over IPv6.

 

What we have achieved:

The DT numbers have exchanged over 1000 emails in the mailing list since the first email sent in SRCOMP mailing list at July 17th, 2020 [2]. After nearly 100 meetings (once or twice meeting per week at the past year), the DT members finally generated the required two documents as planned. The first revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement[3] was submitted at Oct 30th,  2020, and the first revision of draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis [4] was submitted at Feb 19th, 2021.

After several updates, the complete and stable revision of the requirements[3] and analysis drafts[4] had been updated at July 8th , 2021. 

 

We believe the content of these two drafts can be a good input to the SPRING WG. Many thanks for the patience from anybody. 

 

Acknowledgements:

We would like to thank all the members of the design team:

Ron Bonica(Juniper), Weiqiang Cheng(China Mobile), Darren Dukes(Cisco), Wim Henderickx(Nokia),Cheng Li(Huawei), Shaofu Peng(ZTE),Sander Steffann(SJM Steffann), and Chongfeng Xie(China Telecom) (in alphabetical order) 

 

Next Step:

Looking forward to the comments for the requirements draft[3] and analysis draft[4].

 

Best regards,

Weiqiang Cheng on behalf of SRCOMP design team

 

[1].  <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/e-c98UhIyMu7MmLuTXvBE2cXCug/

[2].  <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/

[3].  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement

[4].  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

 

-- 
Srcomp mailing list
 <mailto:Srcomp@ietf.org> Srcomp@ietf.org
 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp