IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Status] Jari Arkko's BLOCK on charter-ietf-spring-00-06

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 11 October 2013 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1D121E808A; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0zWp2VsmAC+V; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919B521E80E2; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUlgyImprnvnQ4K82dbi7ghHS71fSg+1i@postini.com; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:15:14 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E857E1B82F0; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E112B19005C; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:15:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:15:13 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <37FBE6FA-0ECE-478A-861A-FD4CC0A8FC74@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:15:11 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <B281D32A-3606-4556-85D5-FDD3F28F67A0@nominum.com>
References: <525639F6.8010503@cisco.com> <201310101354.r9ADsib8019588@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <70D84A40-EB41-4D70-983A-DE3EB9FFE876@piuha.net> <5256E527.1030806@cisco.com> <37FBE6FA-0ECE-478A-861A-FD4CC0A8FC74@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:27:49 -0700
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "status@ietf.org" <status@ietf.org>, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Status] Jari Arkko's BLOCK on charter-ietf-spring-00-06
X-BeenThere: status@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <status.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/status>
List-Post: <mailto:status@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:15:22 -0000

On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> Would this work for people? FWIW from what I can tell, the above should be relatively easily doable, short cookies in headers, etc. It would remove my main concern of accidentally turned on devices becoming a security hole. It would also help deployment, as firewalls might otherwise default to blocking all kinds of routing headers.

WFM, although it sounds an awful lot like a flow label... :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email