[Storagesync] recent issues discussed (html)

"Fei Song" <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn> Sun, 06 December 2015 10:25 UTC

Return-Path: <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02E81ACD8D for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 02:25:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.089
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_62=0.6, RCVD_IN_PSBL=2.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kkve_A-27JbK for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 02:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bjtu.edu.cn (mail.bjtu.edu.cn [218.249.29.198]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC141ACD86 for <storagesync@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 02:25:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PC-201001061KKK (unknown [211.71.74.217]) by Jdweb2 (Coremail) with SMTP id M55wygAHJfC+DWRWCAAAAA--.0S2; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 18:28:14 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 18:25:28 +0800
From: Fei Song <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
To: storagesync <storagesync@ietf.org>
References: <CAO_YprZTz+O-e82hsTgMBOLr645jJqbhtVKngubnLhimyfB2cg@mail.gmail.com> <71E522FC-C622-4DDE-B444-5CE902980823@cern.ch> <2015112611280303192311@bjtu.edu.cn>, <CAO_YprbsHsDYewHh38uDJ6gOoSZKwO8MoCR+UHz21iarEqEQOA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.91[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2015120618252842112773@bjtu.edu.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart030116828743_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: M55wygAHJfC+DWRWCAAAAA--.0S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7uw4rJrW5Wry3Xr1fArykGrg_yoW8Aw1kpa yxAws8Ka1qq3yaqr1kWws29r48ZFn5Ga13tFs5Gw47Cwn0gas2gFyIvr4SgFW7JryxAasF vF4Yvas8ZFyDZaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUHGb7Iv0xC_tr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j 6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40Eb7x2x7xS6r1j6r4UMc02F40E57IF 67AEF4xIwI1l5I8CrVAKz4kIr2xC04v26r4j6ryUMc02F40E42I26xC2a48xMc02F40Ex7 xS67I2xxkvbII20VAFz48EcVAYj21l5I8CrVC2j2CEjI02ccxYII8I62kEc4x0xVAYj21l Yx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jrv_JF1lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbV WUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACY4xI67k04243AVAKzVAKj4xxM4xvF2IEb7IF0Fy2 6I8I3I1lc2xSY4AK67AK6r4DMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_JrI_Jr Wlx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUJVWUXwCIc40Y0x0EwIxG rwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8Jw CI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Zr0_Wr1UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE x4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l6VACY4xI67k04243AbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvj xU2HqcUUUUU
X-CM-SenderInfo: aytwlqpemw3hxhgxhubq/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/storagesync/AJZRE5fTIGN5PcaiqdC-sLLgogQ>
Subject: [Storagesync] recent issues discussed (html)
X-BeenThere: storagesync@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: fsong <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
List-Id: Mechanisms to synchronize client file systems with Internet-based data storage services <storagesync.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/storagesync/>
List-Post: <mailto:storagesync@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 10:25:29 -0000

Here is the latest version. I classified them a bit. Please email me if anything is missed:
 
1.         The design targets of WebDAV, rsync and other existing approaches?
2.         The potential use cases of ISS, such as client/server, git-like pattern, svn, etc.
3.         The efficiency improvements might be the second goal for standardizing ISS protocol
4.         CORS headers on storage sync APIs
5.         What is needed for the ISS: a sync protocol or a generalized API
6.         remoteStorage draft discussion
a)         relationship vs WebDAV
b)         MOVE action (synchronization) should be added or not
c)         Beside web browser, desktop apps (by hacking way)
d)         comics of new standard
e)         etag is mainly for identifying whether a document is changed or not
f)          the distributed peer model (no server) and C/S mode
7.         GitHub instead of email messages (has been created) with following URL:
https://github.com/labkode/Internet-Storage-Sync
a)         What is the topic? 
                         i.              Whether it is suitable to build on WebDAV
                       ii.              WebDAV vs remoteStorage
                      iii.              Advantages vs disadvantages of WebDAV
8.         Metadata and data separation scheme and platform for synchronization
a)         ownCloud when configured to use an Object Storage as the Primary User Storage. (Metadata is handled by a MySQL database)
b)         CERN EOS Storage System. (Metadata is handled in high performance in-memory structures).
c)         DropBox. (As far as I know it uses S3 behind. For metadata it is unknown, but probably not on S3). 
Paper for analyzing DropBox:
http://annasperotto.org/papers/2012/imc140-drago.pdf
d)         ClawIO will have an implementation of this approach in the next phase using Swift.
 
 
Some related organizations, events, projects, etc.: 
GEANT community, OpenCloudMesh, ownCloud, CS3, remoteStorage, ClawIO, crosscloud, Dropbox, CERN EOS Storage System,to be added…