IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Storagesync] recent issues discussed

"Fei Song" <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn> Fri, 04 December 2015 03:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DAD1B2C9A for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:52:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.688
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_PSBL=2.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sWkZN3THnVmt for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bjtu.edu.cn (mail.bjtu.edu.cn [218.249.29.198]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515981B2C98 for <storagesync@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PC-201001061KKK (unknown [211.71.74.217]) by Jdweb2 (Coremail) with SMTP id M55wygCXoKKGDmFWDgAAAA--.6S2; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:54:46 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:52:05 +0800
From: Fei Song <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
To: storagesync <storagesync@ietf.org>
References: <CAO_YprZTz+O-e82hsTgMBOLr645jJqbhtVKngubnLhimyfB2cg@mail.gmail.com> <71E522FC-C622-4DDE-B444-5CE902980823@cern.ch> <2015112611280303192311@bjtu.edu.cn>, <CAO_YprbsHsDYewHh38uDJ6gOoSZKwO8MoCR+UHz21iarEqEQOA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.91[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2015120411520301597733@bjtu.edu.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart202603565401_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: M55wygCXoKKGDmFWDgAAAA--.6S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrtr4DZrW8Ww17Cry5Aw43Jrb_yoWftrg_Wa 1ftryv9w45Ww17JF1rG3Z3Wr4UAFyvkFyUCay8KF1jg34qvFs5uFn8WFZ3ZF48XFsIq3Z8 Ca43Z347Cw13ujkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbDAYjsxI4VWxJwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJr0_ GcWl84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s 1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG67k08I80eVWUJVW8JwAqx4xG6c804VAF z4xC04v7Mc02F40Ew4AK048IF2xKxVW8JVW5JwAqx4xG6xAIxVCFxsxG0wAv7VC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0 Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4xvF2IEb7IF0Fy264kE64k0F24lFcxC0VAYjxAxZF0Ex2IqxwCY02 Avz4vE14v_Gr4l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUGVWUWwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1j6r15MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJr0_WFyUJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6x kF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJwCE64xvF2IEb7IF0Fy7YxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jz4iUU UUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: aytwlqpemw3hxhgxhubq/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/storagesync/T2eIM5NxIakHMpfQrWKeNdPeTyU>
Subject: [Storagesync] recent issues discussed
X-BeenThere: storagesync@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: fsong <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
List-Id: Mechanisms to synchronize client file systems with Internet-based data storage services <storagesync.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/storagesync/>
List-Post: <mailto:storagesync@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 03:52:07 -0000

Here is the latest version. I classified them a bit. Please email me if anything is missed:
 
1.         The design targets of WebDAV, rsync and other existing approaches?
2.         The potential use cases of ISS, such as client/server, git-like pattern, svn, etc.
3.         The efficiency improvements might be the second goal for standardizing ISS protocol
4.         CORS headers on storage sync APIs
5.         What is needed for the ISS: a sync protocol or a generalized API
6.         remoteStorage draft discussion
a)         relationship vs WebDAV
b)         MOVE action should be added or not
c)         synchronization should be considered or not
d)         comics of new standard
7.         GitHub instead of email messages
a)         What is the topic? 
                         i.              Whether it is suitable to build on WebDAV
                       ii.              WebDAV vs remoteStorage
                      iii.              Advantages vs disadvantages of WebDAV
 
 
Some related organizations, events, projects, etc.: 
GEANT community, OpenCloudMesh, ownCloud, CS3, remoteStorage, ClawIO, crosscloud, to be added…

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email