IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Storagesync] recent issues discussed

"Fei Song" <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn> Fri, 04 December 2015 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7543D1B2CC5 for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:57:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 5.289
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_26=0.6, MIME_BASE64_BLANKS=0.001, RCVD_IN_PSBL=2.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id paFd4Bw9SBrw for <storagesync@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:57:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bjtu.edu.cn (mail.bjtu.edu.cn [218.249.29.198]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6891B2CC4 for <storagesync@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:57:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PC-201001061KKK (unknown [211.71.74.217]) by Jdweb1 (Coremail) with SMTP id Mp5wygAXLX2xD2FWYAAAAA--.9S2; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:59:46 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:57:12 +0800
From: Fei Song <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
To: storagesync <storagesync@ietf.org>
References: <CAO_YprZTz+O-e82hsTgMBOLr645jJqbhtVKngubnLhimyfB2cg@mail.gmail.com> <71E522FC-C622-4DDE-B444-5CE902980823@cern.ch> <2015112611280303192311@bjtu.edu.cn>, <CAO_YprbsHsDYewHh38uDJ6gOoSZKwO8MoCR+UHz21iarEqEQOA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.91[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2015120411571039094935@bjtu.edu.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-CM-TRANSID: Mp5wygAXLX2xD2FWYAAAAA--.9S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7Xr47AryUWFy3XF4DCF17ZFb_yoWDWrb_Wa 1ftryv9w4Ygw1xJF1rK3Z3Wr4UAa4v9Fyqkay8KF1jg34qvFs5uFn8WFZ3Za1FqFsFq3Zx Ca43Z343uw13ujkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbxkYjsxI4VWxJwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_ Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s 0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xII jxv20xvE14v26r106r15McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr 1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFcxC0VAYjxAxZF0Ew4CEw7xC0wACY4xI67k04243AVC20s07 MxkIecxEwVAFwVW8GwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I 0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jr0_JrylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAI cVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcV CF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWUJVWrZr1UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvEx4A2 jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UMVCEFcxC0VAYjxAxZFUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8 ZiStUUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: aytwlqpemw3hxhgxhubq/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/storagesync/DfAKK2A1Lc5YhiFk5-0dHprwlMw>
Subject: [Storagesync] recent issues discussed
X-BeenThere: storagesync@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: fsong <fsong@bjtu.edu.cn>
List-Id: Mechanisms to synchronize client file systems with Internet-based data storage services <storagesync.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/storagesync/>
List-Post: <mailto:storagesync@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storagesync>, <mailto:storagesync-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 03:57:12 -0000

Sorry for the bad format...I have fixed it in this email.

Here is the latest version. I classified them a bit. Please email me if anything is missed:
 
1.The design targets of WebDAV, rsync and other existing approaches?
2.The potential use cases of ISS, such as client/server, git-like pattern, svn, etc.
3.The efficiency improvements might be the second goal for standardizing ISS protocol
4.CORS headers on storage sync APIs
5.What is needed for the ISS: a sync protocol or a generalized API
6.remoteStorage draft discussion
	a)relationship vs WebDAV
	b)MOVE action should be added or not
	c)synchronization should be considered or not
	d)comics of new standard
7.GitHub instead of email messages
	a)What is the topic? 
		i.Whether it is suitable to build on WebDAV
		ii.WebDAV vs remoteStorage
		iii.Advantages vs disadvantages of WebDAV


Some related organizations, events, projects, etc.: 
GEANT community, OpenCloudMesh, ownCloud, CS3, remoteStorage, ClawIO, crosscloud, to be added...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email