Re: [sunset4] FW: draft-li-behave-NAT444-Test and draft-tsou-stateless-nat44

["Will Liu (Shucheng)" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for your comments. Followings are my reply to them.
1)I will read those drafts you mentioned and search your comments. 
2)What we proposed is focused to do and only do modification on the CGN, without too many changes on the current v4 network. Map with IPv6 is another scenario.
3) Should be "bypass". Sorry for that.

Cheers,
Will


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> Behalf Of Dan Wing
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 12:44 AM
> To: 'George, Wes'; [e-mail]; Will Liu (Shucheng)
> Subject: Re: [sunset4] FW: draft-li-behave-NAT444-Test and
> draft-tsou-stateless-nat44
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> > Behalf Of George, Wes
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 7:24 AM
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Subject: [sunset4] FW: draft-li-behave-NAT444-Test and draft-tsou-
> > stateless-nat44
> >
> > The answers to our questions on two drafts are below. Please review and
> > comment on the content of the answers, either together or separately.
> > I'd like some discussion on the draft or the questions on-list before
> > we get into the meeting.
> 
> See below.
> 
> > Thanks
> >
> > Wes George
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Will Liu (Shucheng) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:42 AM
> > To: George, Wes
> > Cc: [e-mail]
> > Subject: Asking for two 10min slots
> >
> > Hi George,
> >
> > Thanks for your kindly reminding. Sorry for my carelessness. :D May I
> > ask for 2 time slots for draft-Li-Behave-NAT444-Test-00 and draft-tsou-
> > stateless-nat44？Each presentation would last for 10min and the
> > presenter will be Will Liu.
> >
> > Following are my answers to your three question for both drafts:
> > Q:
> > 1) describe the problem to be solved and show that there is widespread
> > demand for a solution
> > 2) demonstrate that the problem can not be solved with existing
> > technologies
> > 3) provide a description of the proposed solution along with its impact
> > on current IPv4-only use and justification that it does not harm or
> > delay the deployment of IPv6
> >
> > A:
> > draft-Li-Behave-NAT444-Test-00
> > 1) NAT444 is a common scenario in operators’ network.  Operators are
> > worried whether applications will be affected when they pass though
> > multi-level NAT. This test document provides experiences for both
> > operators and researchers.
> > 2) During testing, we find some problems such as QQ online Gaming
> > doesn’t permit two user with the same public IP address in same game
> > room.
> 
> Other applications have a similar restriction.  For example, Mohamed
> has done extensive testing with BitTorrent and described the precise
> slowdowns and the precise failures when two users are sharing the
> same IPv4 address, draft-boucadair-pcp-bittorrent.
> 
> Cablelabs published results of some of their testing using a
> different mix of applications.  I have previously raised
> objections to their testing methodology and results.  Their
> document is draft-donley-nat444-impacts.

> 
> > 3) This is a testing draft. Proposed solution is not related.
> >
> > draft-tsou-stateless-nat44-00
> > 1)  To let the NAT44 CGN simple, to reduce the cost of CGN. Different
> > from traditional NAT44: no per-session state on the CGN, no binding
> > table, no per-flow state to be maintained, zero log, high speed, easy
> > to deploy hot backup.
> > 2)  Traditional NAT44 CGN need per-session state on the CGN, binding
> > table, per-flow state to be maintained. These make the CGN expensive
> > and difficult to achieve CGN hot backup.
> > 3)  Solve the exhaustion of IPv4 address when the network migrate to
> > IPv6. Because it is stateless, the ISPs don’t need too much cost to
> > deploy it.
> 
> This seems to be a MAP solution.  But differs from MAP in that it uses
> an IPv4 network between the subscriber and the ISP's "stateless NAT44"
> device, whereas MAP uses an IPv6 network between the subscriber and
> the ISP's "MAP border relay" device.
> 
> > It can also be implemented in dual-stack network(IPv4
> > traffic pass through stateless NAT44 and IPv6 traffic pass by stateless
> > NAT44), so the network can migrate to IPv6 smoothly.
> 
> Typo in that sentence?
> 
> -d
> 
> 
> > Regards,
> > Will
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: George, Wes [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:48 PM
> > To: Will Liu (Shucheng); [e-mail]
> > Subject: RE: Asking for a 10min slot
> >
> > Please see the message I sent to the list this AM.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Wes
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Will Liu (Shucheng) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 5:30 AM
> > > To: [e-mail]
> > > Subject: Asking for a 10min slot
> > >
> > > Hi Chairs,
> > >
> > > I am writing to ask for a 10 min slot for a presentation for
> > > draft-tsou- stateless-nat44.
> > > Presenter name is Will Liu and length of presentation is 10 minutes.
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Have a nice day!
> > > Will
> >
> > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
> > proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject
> > to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended
> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> > addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you
> > are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or
> > action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-
> > mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received
> > this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
> > permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any
> > printout.
> > _______________________________________________
> > sunset4 mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sunset4 mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4