Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream
Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de> Mon, 15 March 2010 12:51 UTC
Return-Path: <pagaltzis@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B833B3A6C6A for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jOAJUDAttDN3 for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 67D093A6CEB for <tap@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2010 12:33:30 -0000
Received: from static-87-79-236-202.netcologne.de (EHLO klangraum) [87.79.236.202] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 15 Mar 2010 13:33:30 +0100
X-Authenticated: #163624
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+4oZtvQU+4VeY0HwyNT/Hj9s+GwDxu3HsWdkAj2i +mx10Z5WCZXWQD
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:33:06 +0100
From: Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de>
To: tap@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20100315123306.GD27881@klangraum.plasmasturm.org>
Mail-Followup-To: tap@ietf.org
References: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1003021642090.2167@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1003021642090.2167@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.67000000000000004
Subject: Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream
X-BeenThere: tap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Test Anything Protocol WG discussions <tap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tap>
List-Post: <mailto:tap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:51:34 -0000
* Salve J Nilsen <sjn@pvv.org> [2010-03-02 16:45]: > So, what do people think? Should the TAP spec use "stream" > instead of "document" where "document" is used now? Yes, or at least for the most part. The way I see it is that a TAP document is an archived TAP stream. The stream angle is more fundamental, but the document angle may be necessary in describing some use cases. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
- [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Salve J Nilsen
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Ovid
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Andy Armstrong
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Shlomi Fish
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Salve J Nilsen
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Aristotle Pagaltzis